Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 14:12:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 14:12:17 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:39437 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 14:12:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:16:32 +0100 (BST) Cc: greearb@candelatech.com (Ben Greear), hadi@cyberus.ca (jamal), mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Alexey Kuznetsov), Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se (Robert Olsson), bcrl@redhat.com (Benjamin LaHaise), netdev@oss.sgi.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) In-Reply-To: from "Linus Torvalds" at Oct 03, 2001 09:33:12 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > (a) is not a major security issue. If you allow untrusted users full > 100/1000Mbps access to your internal network, you have _other_ > security issues, like packet sniffing etc that are much much MUCH > worse. So the packet flooding thing is very much a corner case, and > claiming that we have a big problem is silly. Not nowdays. 100Mbit pipes to the backbone are routine for web serving in the real world - at least the paying end (aka porn). Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/