Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 6 May 2019 11:18:23 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Uwe Kleine-Konig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Add sched_load_rq tracepoint
Message-ID: <20190506091823.GF2650@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20190505115732.9844-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>
 <20190505115732.9844-5-qais.yousef@arm.com>
 <20190506090859.GK2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190506090859.GK2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:08:59AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Also; I _really_ hate how fat they are. Why can't we do simple straight
> forward things like:
> 
> 	trace_pelt_cfq(cfq);
> 	trace_pelt_rq(rq);
> 	trace_pelt_se(se);
> 
> And then have the thing attached to the event do the fat bits like
> extract the path and whatnot.

ARGH, because we don't export any of those data structures (for good
reason).. bah I hate all this.