Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp2487220yba; Mon, 6 May 2019 06:56:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyc3uhdx9/odN9UN1nnTC+SPLbR/7jcMsvmCMr2n9/LhIjJiBgDj5GSZch/03URDn4/Nq71 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4683:: with SMTP id p3mr31417912pld.42.1557151012281; Mon, 06 May 2019 06:56:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557151012; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tnGaxOXyvF2ecOHDe/Ewss6T32S7gpffakUKmVHRUV6+4zn3BX4InIPtgy/0mwPynP buWHrtCop/cIPHmb51EnbINFmJ1TUwQlQop0ePziY+QPlXalWSQPHBf00zqwwng1GcWd 7Z0InAtlJtTshCvkjJniOvrNge9xgi1WOPWwV8YhanvRwShYhtlmwoeCDqAcEMyT5Glb Af7fxIg9a4uq99aw8kecInoP0TBvfqmoOZ7drEONMoY7sLqmEsTisT6kHh980pLbVCUI VKOjZ0AU19ghSVAAMd8Ek7hgpOAl8p7qowX8F+J7qn+1QwYHAWum8QW0LMc/0JPHGLr/ 76mg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:date:message-id:subject:cc:from:to :in-reply-to; bh=2eUMwE+Q3+DLUCWh5uWAL8aJAmFP2PSY3jBMYsXzIBw=; b=GeBNddA3LUejzooamXby72eDiMpG7s1+gNrNhekwPIa3C9DpTP/GforzpftPBkBTKt ODH0Gl5d8gavWa2kMuwB0O7Kup5S1QCxeTLZyo7B4GYeClByJPXtAYddJVxraWzptJRj XOD93pAtlWUuZcymJoOZuV25SMoS5J8/VTfKnZyTtuNfDs2nkA2WtYY9RFkEkZDfo5zc alQ1KIDqsW3aGAa/mUSawcLMMrCA/ZgeiWC+sjPs0MFA550/sMdHKCU4q/E4Z5meOsSu mVFO5eCtgzpwu9j0d9lT8PhAAdJKxt2eOhpaKifuKUyMIvbMYB2VTuo58fZRm8JKzhs8 vgog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b2si14445995pls.279.2019.05.06.06.56.35; Mon, 06 May 2019 06:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726453AbfEFNyP (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 May 2019 09:54:15 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:59145 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726434AbfEFNyM (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 09:54:12 -0400 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 44yPNf0rL1z9sDQ; Mon, 6 May 2019 23:54:09 +1000 (AEST) X-powerpc-patch-notification: thanks X-powerpc-patch-commit: 67d53f30e23ec66aa7bbdd1592d5e64d46876190 X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore In-Reply-To: <3a330ee8d98fce60c08c3d26054d2f0f8f53b66a.1557130203.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> To: Christophe Leroy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras From: Michael Ellerman Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: fix section mismatch for setup_kup() Message-Id: <44yPNf0rL1z9sDQ@ozlabs.org> Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 23:54:09 +1000 (AEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 08:10:43 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote: > commit b28c97505eb1 ("powerpc/64: Setup KUP on secondary CPUs") > moved setup_kup() out of the __init section. As stated in that commit, > "this is only for 64-bit". But this function is also used on PPC32, > where the two functions called by setup_kup() are in the __init > section, so setup_kup() has to either be kept in the __init > section on PPC32 or marked __ref. > > This patch marks it __ref, it fixes the below build warnings. > > MODPOST vmlinux.o > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x169ec): Section mismatch in reference from the function setup_kup() to the function .init.text:setup_kuep() > The function setup_kup() references > the function __init setup_kuep(). > This is often because setup_kup lacks a __init > annotation or the annotation of setup_kuep is wrong. > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x16a04): Section mismatch in reference from the function setup_kup() to the function .init.text:setup_kuap() > The function setup_kup() references > the function __init setup_kuap(). > This is often because setup_kup lacks a __init > annotation or the annotation of setup_kuap is wrong. > > Fixes: b28c97505eb1 ("powerpc/64: Setup KUP on secondary CPUs") > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy Applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/67d53f30e23ec66aa7bbdd1592d5e64d cheers