Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190429150135.15070-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <CAHp75VeE=88mCcgVx3Y3PQJPQ819Z7=3s=jRGz1y=t09phk=rA@mail.gmail.com>
 <085c5b6e-d220-ebd1-38d2-def7efca24b8@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <085c5b6e-d220-ebd1-38d2-def7efca24b8@redhat.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 May 2019 17:59:25 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vfe9uK_b_V+uG29wb1L6J7u1hpbU+P4beXso9KNPM+8Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: pmc_atom: Add Lex 3I380D industrial PC to
 critclk_systems DMI table
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Semyon Verchenko <semverchenko@factor-ts.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 5:47 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 06-05-19 14:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:01 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The Lex 3I380D industrial PC has 4 ethernet controllers on board
> >> which need pmc_plt_clk0 - 3 to function, add it to the critclk_systems
> >> DMI table, so that drivers/clk/x86/clk-pmc-atom.c will mark the clocks
> >> as CLK_CRITICAL and they will not get turned off.
> >>
> >
> > Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> > supposedly to go via CLK tree.
> >
> > P.S. If you want it through PDx86, I need immutable branch / tag from CLK.
>
> Stephen added the patches this depends on to his fixes branch, so they
> are in the 5.1 / Torvald's master branch, since we are now in the 5.2 merge
> window, you should be able to cleanly apply this directly.

We don't do back merges, so, our base is v5.1-rc1. Does it mean the
commit in question is in v5.1-rc1?
AFAICS it was appeared in v5.1-rc5.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko