Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751232AbVKIObM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:31:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751357AbVKIObL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:31:11 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:36307 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751044AbVKIObJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:31:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:31:07 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind Message-ID: <20051109143107.GV7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 506 Lines: 11 On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:54:36AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Shouldn't this check go before copy_tree()? Not much point in copying > the tree if we are sure it won't be used. Incorrect. Propagation nodes further down the tree can very well be mountable. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/