Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp2583098yba; Mon, 6 May 2019 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2e0dIN7o3fAH2s3w2FveLfPu9ijcqB/kfZbgKt6pZCUrATn5wvgzfer8RaxJ0eQ4Hohly X-Received: by 2002:a63:e110:: with SMTP id z16mr32839286pgh.165.1557155966800; Mon, 06 May 2019 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557155966; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jfpopUTbt/Dw6uRIBWDzddQxsniLmqh9LUwnjT4R6q0R8I04J2icIXgos8QDxBWx8W 2wLVE5QahXByTAJDdIAY0ulr0Xcq0kwBvDPkZksdPQHq8tDkKONVXgFTDoWf+YFI5xlv KE4DuZCUFycj5UJYgVCdY7+CYw7DLhM3r3a7GvwvrJ4f9QEHWFUUp4vzJHYfHclUB8Je SxRt744970v8n43w6TTNwtcsbW33AgXNweakhJMk9pZzgzATdgMdoJJOo2I8k5GYXFDQ 5sMXckRHUuc6rBSQDXCnoDyZnBW0kcFlqDELgx6YJi1gEL8Tt30pcISLP9LCN1Ntyoey 9gjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=/X6wSgCzUq7JEx8PD3yvb1/Zg5Vd9qzEvlPgK4bRFk4=; b=uQyMbIe6R03nnJVF+MmL2twxAIeq4Uv4nTDlud+YGp22OB0wdM29PkmxFbF6CRZBAm ntq7wI9L5bqj7ev7CFVwVcUIUn9kLakZ+yCAnM8SDd+kV84UwvnZlHSO8TjNQ/QpoSd+ atUMqsD/2eQg+SG4QcqCeLSbe6l4JEKHc6O1IB0OpJv/fD+J9eD/s49/p7RjQdBLKhG4 6fxDaq/bwWesxbGPupslZWenAGMa/B/zeQaED26GbjTsSPFj+K0pJ3r3s+SPE+Zhe2bZ vBFHf69tmrOjfX0bT5Ui0arV7yvqTwEB8/NxSYhB4cO5p18JoIGsQle85ExSRHgjw0zr 6Liw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q137si14632234pgq.58.2019.05.06.08.19.11; Mon, 06 May 2019 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726653AbfEFPQz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 May 2019 11:16:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52786 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726236AbfEFPQz (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 11:16:55 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4E8ACFB; Mon, 6 May 2019 15:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 17:16:52 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: LKML , Linux I2C , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: ee1004: Deal with nack on page selection Message-ID: <20190506171652.3ba909de@endymion> In-Reply-To: <04843f27-bb0f-d631-32c8-80cd122b7399@linux.intel.com> References: <20190506151539.69ee75e8@endymion> <20190506151656.47494e56@endymion> <04843f27-bb0f-d631-32c8-80cd122b7399@linux.intel.com> Organization: SUSE Linux X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 May 2019 17:03:20 +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 5/6/19 4:16 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Some EE1004 implementations will not properly ack page selection > > commands. They still set the page correctly, so there is no actual > > error. Deal with this case gracefully by checking the currently > > selected page after we receive a nack. If the page is set right then > > we can continue. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > > Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > --- > > drivers/misc/eeprom/ee1004.c | 12 +++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Does Dreamcat4 deserve reported and tested by tags here? I guess > anonymous address is fine with those tags? My assumption is that someone who posts anonymously in the first place has no desire to be credited for anything or even mentioned anywhere. > (I re-tested these two patches on top of v5.1 and they make decode-dimms > working on a machine with 2-4 * Crucial DD4 dimms) Thank you very much. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support