Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 6 May 2019 18:20:39 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phil@raspberrypi.org,
        stefan.wahren@i2se.com, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: vchiq: revert "switch to
 wait_for_completion_killable"
Message-ID: <20190506152039.GT2239@kadam>
References: <20190506144030.29056-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
 <20190506144030.29056-3-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190506144030.29056-3-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> @@ -1740,7 +1740,8 @@ parse_rx_slots(struct vchiq_state *state)
>  					&service->bulk_rx : &service->bulk_tx;
>  
>  				DEBUG_TRACE(PARSE_LINE);
> -				if (mutex_lock_killable(&service->bulk_mutex)) {
> +				if (mutex_lock_killable(
> +					&service->bulk_mutex) != 0) {

This series does't add != 0 consistently...  Personally, I would prefer
we just leave it out.  I use != 0 for two things.  1)  When I'm talking
about the number zero.

	if (len == 0) {

Or with strcmp():

	if (strcmp(a, b) == 0) { // a equals b
	if (strcmp(a, b) < 0) {  // a less than b.

But here zero means no errors, so I would just leave it out...

regards,
dan carpenter