Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751449AbVKIQbZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:31:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751044AbVKIQbZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:31:25 -0500 Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com ([195.54.107.73]:7316 "EHLO mxfep02.bredband.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751447AbVKIQbZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:31:25 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,309,1125871200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="8874086:sNHT28229031" Subject: Re: New Linux Development Model From: Ian Kumlien Reply-To: pomac@vapor.com To: Al Viro Cc: "Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:03:07 +0100" , marado@isp.novis.pt, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fawadlateef@gmail.com, s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk, hostmaster@ed-soft.at, jerome.lacoste@gmail.com, carlsj@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20051109155846.GZ7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <1131500868.2413.63.camel@localhost> <1131534496.8930.15.camel@noori.ip.pt> <1131535832.2413.75.camel@localhost> <20051109130307.bd1b2cce.grundig@teleline.es> <1131551357.2413.80.camel@localhost> <20051109155846.GZ7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-YEeI2l18ONj+zX8lEYUg" Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:32:19 +0100 Message-Id: <1131553939.2413.94.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1379 Lines: 42 --=-YEeI2l18ONj+zX8lEYUg Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:58 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:49:17PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote: >=20 > > > People is allowed to have different opinions than you, deal with it. > >=20 > > And that applies to me to, now deal with it. >=20 > That's easy - you are welcome to maintain whatever tree you like accordin= g > to your opinion. Same as everybody else. ROTFLOL, Yeah i know, I just think it's more about the users need than 'stable' and 'unstable', Just label it experimental so the user knows what they are getting into. (Just like the examples posted in other mails) --=20 Ian Kumlien -- http://pomac.netswarm.net --=-YEeI2l18ONj+zX8lEYUg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDciST7F3Euyc51N8RAq+JAKCfYwHuRSq1OiNgukhU0BYJ5YafPACfUYtj 8R+cvoZyji8crJX7LNWioZE= =Y3Pa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-YEeI2l18ONj+zX8lEYUg-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/