Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Michal Gregorczyk <michalgr@live.com>,
        Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>,
        Mohammad Husain <russoue@gmail.com>,
        Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
        Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
        duyuchao <yuchao.du@unisoc.com>,
        Manjo Raja Rao <linux@manojrajarao.com>,
        Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@opersys.com>,
        Tamir Carmeli <carmeli.tamir@gmail.com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, kernel-team@android.com,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] bpf: Add support for reading user pointers
Date:   Mon,  6 May 2019 14:31:13 -0400
Message-Id: <20190506183116.33014-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

The eBPF based opensnoop tool fails to read the file path string passed
to the do_sys_open function. This is because it is a pointer to
userspace address and causes an -EFAULT when read with
probe_kernel_read. This is not an issue when running the tool on x86 but
is an issue on arm64. This patch adds a new bpf function call based
which calls the recently proposed probe_user_read function [1].
Using this function call from opensnoop fixes the issue on arm64.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1051588/

Cc: Michal Gregorczyk <michalgr@live.com>
Cc: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
Cc: Mohammad Husain <russoue@gmail.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc: Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>
Cc: duyuchao <yuchao.du@unisoc.com>
Cc: Manjo Raja Rao <linux@manojrajarao.com>
Cc: Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@opersys.com>
Cc: Tamir Carmeli <carmeli.tamir@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
Masami, could you carry these patches in the series where are you add
probe_user_read function?

Previous submissions is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1069552/
v1->v2: split tools uapi sync into separate commit, added deprecation
warning for old bpf_probe_read function.

 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  9 ++++++++-
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 929c8e537a14..8146784b9fe3 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2431,6 +2431,12 @@ union bpf_attr {
  *	Return
  *		A **struct bpf_sock** pointer on success, or **NULL** in
  *		case of failure.
+ *
+ * int bpf_probe_read_user(void *dst, int size, void *src)
+ *     Description
+ *             Read a userspace pointer safely.
+ *     Return
+ *             0 on success or negative error
  */
 #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
 	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -2531,7 +2537,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
 	FN(sk_fullsock),		\
 	FN(tcp_sock),			\
 	FN(skb_ecn_set_ce),		\
-	FN(get_listener_sock),
+	FN(get_listener_sock),		\
+	FN(probe_read_user),
 
 /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
  * function eBPF program intends to call
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index d64c00afceb5..7485deb0777f 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -153,6 +153,26 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_proto = {
 	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
 };
 
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_user, void *, dst, u32, size, const void *, unsafe_ptr)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = probe_user_read(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
+	if (unlikely(ret < 0))
+		memset(dst, 0, size);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_user_proto = {
+	.func		= bpf_probe_read_user,
+	.gpl_only	= true,
+	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
+	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
+	.arg2_type	= ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
+	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
+};
+
 BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_write_user, void *, unsafe_ptr, const void *, src,
 	   u32, size)
 {
@@ -571,6 +591,8 @@ tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		return &bpf_map_delete_elem_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read:
 		return &bpf_probe_read_proto;
+	case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user:
+		return &bpf_probe_read_user_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns:
 		return &bpf_ktime_get_ns_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_tail_call:
-- 
2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog