Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932153AbVKIQ7q (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:59:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932165AbVKIQ7q (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:59:46 -0500 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:65507 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932153AbVKIQ7p (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:59:45 -0500 Message-ID: <43722AFC.4040709@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:59:40 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beulich CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/39] NLKD - Novell Linux Kernel Debugger References: <43720DAE.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> In-Reply-To: <43720DAE.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 600 Lines: 17 Jan Beulich wrote: > The following patch set represents the Novell Linux Kernel Debugger, > stripped off of its original low-level exception handling framework. Honestly, just seeing all these code changes makes me think we really don't need it in the kernel. How many "early" and "alternative" gadgets do we really need just for this thing? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/