Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750936AbVKIRGW (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:06:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751414AbVKIRGW (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:06:22 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:57816 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750936AbVKIRGV (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:06:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:06:16 -0800 (PST) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: rddunlap@shark.he.net To: Jeff Garzik cc: Jan Beulich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/39] NLKD - Novell Linux Kernel Debugger In-Reply-To: <43722AFC.4040709@pobox.com> Message-ID: References: <43720DAE.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> <43722AFC.4040709@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 935 Lines: 26 On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jan Beulich wrote: > > The following patch set represents the Novell Linux Kernel Debugger, > > stripped off of its original low-level exception handling framework. > > > Honestly, just seeing all these code changes makes me think we really > don't need it in the kernel. How many "early" and "alternative" gadgets > do we really need just for this thing? On the surface I have to agree. However, if Jan wants feedback on the patches, that's a reasonable request IMO. (but they need to be readable via email so that someone can comment on them) At a quick blush, I would guess it has as much chance as kdb does (or did) for merging. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/