Message-Id: <43723C6D.76F0.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:14:05 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@pobox.com>, "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/39] NLKD - Novell Linux Kernel Debugger
References: <43720DAE.76F0.0078.0@novell.com>  <43722AFC.4040709@pobox.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511090904320.4001@shark.he.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511090904320.4001@shark.he.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 942
Lines: 25

>On the surface I have to agree.  However, if Jan wants feedback
>on the patches, that's a reasonable request IMO.

Getting feedback is not the only goal.

>(but they need to be readable via email so that someone
>can comment on them)

Sorry, I hear this quite often, but I also have to play by some company
rules, one of which is to use a certain mail system (or otherwise be
left alone in case of problems).

>At a quick blush, I would guess it has as much chance as
>kdb does (or did) for merging.

The intention isn't necessarily to merge the whole debugger, but what
we desire is to merge everything to allow the debugger to be built
outside of the tree (perhaps as a standalong module).

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/