Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3083294yba; Mon, 6 May 2019 16:59:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzrpM3kmQwsaynq3Hb7K1+BDIY3jr0sNljjFbUUypjjIFwQwOM4/nbqy4TRVV7Ps9LgWah7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a988:: with SMTP id bh8mr36073006plb.243.1557187190802; Mon, 06 May 2019 16:59:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557187190; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w4uYhoj5bpFImR8Fh+GzEAy0o/CtHGLtiwPCqumfcX2ujzS8C0FSAasfJENFZEFQ3n uGlOO+/c0zWNq01Km1KwkgnhmUbDDdImztGtyb7MyojKLuTws1/EXV6ACayB7Uwh97m/ 4vgRQFFW9KxBFS3d4iEd3GShWcimqFc9DMLskU7TA8qIB6+OKUaMrfX/w/wLyh0NNlQN OUfoSqtF2n+NEIp/2btylGpwz/C0Mob/N2AFR4XH47vMG4ywg9EA6hFeQnZPOKRXOwvs tLkYgQXSUrgHDe/84DvptUWD0NDN60pEMYD5l5UOXNQbp+xjd5/ga3bRQV0KT88SXbRg fR5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=mx65sXO1r4vrgQ2kHviuuHpS6yfDT9JxVfsYUs6Yhno=; b=hFVQy+HmC0rLZgkYKig0EifQQc6NNnrnXUjm22bnW+S+9a47DE+zDAjpVx7LdSCfHj FebBJjG24zWe17NTvxAf/izov/Oloh+HcEzzuJPIg73SGQyVICxj1QICMgYOOue2SWlq trD64DkoUDs+XYUZo3EzWwRy2JrXbwQ5AmDK6taz7qt6W0FOIbDRibMEdftnbk3JB0QH ysy4amgNTfGg0OFOowHkCs5YyOj6vBuzkap/vabydDrDQpO2gFNybqdRgI5hVoONDcpd Z3bhgH/ICryG2iqbJ1vfuiruDOWoRZZS05C1EYP5UKtRevBYdM7SJeueBiUM5+RzoHUx bdpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=XJNA4uFR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i18si15145401pfd.64.2019.05.06.16.59.34; Mon, 06 May 2019 16:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=XJNA4uFR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726455AbfEFX6p (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 May 2019 19:58:45 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f67.google.com ([209.85.217.67]:39667 "EHLO mail-vs1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726046AbfEFX6p (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 19:58:45 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f67.google.com with SMTP id g127so9251002vsd.6 for ; Mon, 06 May 2019 16:58:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mx65sXO1r4vrgQ2kHviuuHpS6yfDT9JxVfsYUs6Yhno=; b=XJNA4uFR67wlqSxbXVvJFANNEYgMlJH7KBPzpr3b7DMeji4eUc4UYf6iB8tdfjqLj2 77oM72iVyJUyg5ERdVepbiioCfuJrdGT64WpTPel7XkYiuWgcVFuRGXKqFaYf/alwG8G nTnfmO7nurua4ICMHXTiKYOqKMonbeIU+6AIo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mx65sXO1r4vrgQ2kHviuuHpS6yfDT9JxVfsYUs6Yhno=; b=gWHDKz84ZJa7/BGJg/zSGkyNPW56mkCIB81E93iE7fBxP/h7ixHR5GR02i8FDL6K1m a6HyEktWevcQ4diQsJmA1LkJIC6rmzsWmxXlXkddpINjLWu+tsQZkPitUy1QxATGvqk2 nqyQ5bBOQX7ggN5FSC7idIOW386l4dCpO0MwHvVV2k8Z9X0vKC+qDhHvwJnxCUPLSElw /2q5z4WCECucbOXYB3xe9+4O8Gu6Ds0m6Cq3LWEuTZ6OgSmYk48XKun/n86ytqHJLyyE G9JpkdXRoLR3Ohor+Xor4YDZUUM9cC9kxSKuNXWa7QjwxCSSKbCb84HgToBuXMigJkws dRpA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUm5InBTCuPhjEs6isx4htYMLkYYyI4g4wR42VMN+2rVCbFViqf QAF/S1utEjpMOhDqE2d6vMTRO1B9Zi4= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c508:: with SMTP id e8mr15890339vsk.230.1557187124096; Mon, 06 May 2019 16:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vs1-f47.google.com (mail-vs1-f47.google.com. [209.85.217.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g3sm1169499vkb.9.2019.05.06.16.58.43 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 May 2019 16:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-f47.google.com with SMTP id z145so9265714vsc.0 for ; Mon, 06 May 2019 16:58:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a67:af10:: with SMTP id v16mr9106628vsl.149.1557187122785; Mon, 06 May 2019 16:58:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190503174730.245762-1-dianders@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: From: Doug Anderson Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:58:29 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore/ram: Improve backward compatibility with older Chromebooks To: Kees Cook Cc: Rob Herring , Anton Vorontsov , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Julius Werner , Guenter Roeck , Matthias Kaehlcke , Brian Norris , Colin Cross , Tony Luck , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:10 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > From: Douglas Anderson > Date: Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:48 AM > To: Kees Cook, Anton Vorontsov > Cc: , , > , , , > Douglas Anderson, Colin Cross, Tony Luck, > > > > When you try to run an upstream kernel on an old ARM-based Chromebook > > you'll find that console-ramoops doesn't work. > > > > Old ARM-based Chromebooks, before > > ("ramoops: support upstream {console,pmsg,ftrace}-size properties") > > used to create a "ramoops" node at the top level that looked like: > > > > / { > > ramoops { > > compatible = "ramoops"; > > reg = <...>; > > record-size = <...>; > > dump-oops; > > }; > > }; > > > > ...and these Chromebooks assumed that the downstream kernel would make > > console_size / pmsg_size match the record size. The above ramoops > > node was added by the firmware so it's not easy to make any changes. > > > > Let's match the expected behavior, but only for those using the old > > backward-compatible way of working where ramoops is right under the > > root node. > > > > NOTE: if there are some out-of-tree devices that had ramoops at the > > top level, left everything but the record size as 0, and somehow > > doesn't want this behavior, we can try to add more conditions here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson > > I like this; thanks! Rob is this okay by you? I just want to > double-check since it's part of the DT parsing logic. > > I'll pick it up and add a Cc: stable. Hold off a second--I may need to send out a v2 but out of time for the day. I think I need a #include file to fix errors on x86: > implicit declaration of function 'of_node_is_root' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration I'm unfortunately out of time for now, but I'll post a v2 within the next day. -Doug