Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190503093117.54830-1-hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com> <20190503093117.54830-5-hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190503093117.54830-5-hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
From:   Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 14:24:51 +0900
Message-ID: <CANMq1KCiK69kXkpagccqd1=pKOs7qOOVuJUaCe5JfoGVmPt7mg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for the
 MediaTek MT6358 PMIC
To:     Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
        linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 6:34 PM Hsin-Hsiung Wang
<hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> This adds compatible for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC.
>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt
> index 0ebd08af777d..62f1c17c7738 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt
> @@ -17,22 +17,27 @@ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt
>  This document describes the binding for MFD device and its sub module.
>
>  Required properties:
> -compatible: "mediatek,mt6397" or "mediatek,mt6323"
> +compatible:
> +       "mediatek,mt6323" for PMIC MT6323
> +       "mediatek,mt6358" for PMIC MT6358
> +       "mediatek,mt6397" for PMIC MT6397
>
>  Optional subnodes:
>
>  - rtc
>         Required properties:
> -               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-rtc"
> +               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-rtc" or "mediatek,mt6358-rtc"
>  - regulators
>         Required properties:
>                 - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-regulator"
>         see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mt6397-regulator.txt
> +               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6358-regulator"
> +       see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mt6358-regulator.txt
>                 - compatible: "mediatek,mt6323-regulator"
>         see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mt6323-regulator.txt
>  - codec
>         Required properties:
> -               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-codec"
> +               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-codec" or "mediatek,mt6358-sound"

Sean had a question about this
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10846669/#22524299):
"why didn't we use a more consistent naming as mt6358-codec?"

>  - clk
>         Required properties:
>                 - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-clk"
> --
> 2.18.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek