Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3333896yba; Mon, 6 May 2019 22:40:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx43K/BUrUfi3bgmc7dVIAq0azzY8xnra66RtdTxpap9AC0A4+HmMnX9joLc5lDYx+/rzmF X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2827:: with SMTP id e36mr36739426plb.45.1557207617473; Mon, 06 May 2019 22:40:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557207617; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LQiwfR0vf9Qy5xm7HAezeRT9kSOdw8b11q7hJJjFN733IEJiLZR1mttnX6pwj3PQRV 67ljc+9V7BiRA4HMuLmRYXexV+VYNsKtdyoWqM+/sfJhQnSMrgUfqkBbMqInxwahTXDS XO8UWN8I3WPgk/ytE1i19FEv3Xm2pX22bm/NuU5jrbr1EsWHvsoFSuK7GypRLpElpK34 /048ELRa0T3zrGnOUB58CrJlJkOXpdMWZIi5cR8rNoLAnS4ZRgaRq07QAn9/FVETwJas pgruUUABPZI5Ly4LEBqM0nRWrSHfKcpFDVcJ1nceiFPI+QfCI9fLu47HJDyGZGSbgmfW CIag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=MYivS4rFRtfjs9OjDs6d/Vd7T/QEP+DYV07ABLUGRjQ=; b=Ujzq81LuW1fRpL7H2C7i41PJL2JLwogPE9tR7OgYiZls65ia7Z1Io21f5pUQRhhZYv f525ndh8N4xx/HE7KB9Wf12KrsDLjMCCnx9mJDovGONdoLP2F6DwpGeu2PfawcPIBetX 5Tw1TwYJ/Hxbc1iedBY15UBu4eobBH+hdygfTUv30W3kwxO7gz7aRSFQkK8YLQnNSncm tiyr9N9Z1oD6oBwU4OuYvF39gtX3Ngd+G2Uv/j8BOY54i7ERJekEKpj0hYPhJhm8swPK nz0qXzVxKl2xs8z5du6ydKPHnRYlOiRybN4Mp5ACMDmC+ZBOA9pWH5ejOs7o88wd+Asn Cx+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=kvAK+IVN; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z6si17778266plo.372.2019.05.06.22.40.02; Mon, 06 May 2019 22:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=kvAK+IVN; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728804AbfEGFjK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 May 2019 01:39:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58746 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728799AbfEGFjH (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 01:39:07 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C4EC2087F; Tue, 7 May 2019 05:39:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557207546; bh=fSR++6+gYhk9xqGswU5f+QsciubFC4MA0Ap4MAcdRoI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kvAK+IVN6m+Q6vt0Eqp8xPrcj2VF9FgSBrP9q9QewPDzTi14A82tZ7/CkkwEctlra vDXtxHD8amnZzF0nJUtzmscEXoYdEY5AXVUVIjSpUwObussUXdHLeSgacCvtAUkXYv kJ+ifZaZbUOxrNsoF0feo/Aj6OUv56NQMS6l9Dl0= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Johannes Weiner , Shakeel Butt , Roman Gushchin , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Sasha Levin , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 21/95] mm: fix inactive list balancing between NUMA nodes and cgroups Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 01:37:10 -0400 Message-Id: <20190507053826.31622-21-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190507053826.31622-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190507053826.31622-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Weiner [ Upstream commit 3b991208b897f52507168374033771a984b947b1 ] During !CONFIG_CGROUP reclaim, we expand the inactive list size if it's thrashing on the node that is about to be reclaimed. But when cgroups are enabled, we suddenly ignore the node scope and use the cgroup scope only. The result is that pressure bleeds between NUMA nodes depending on whether cgroups are merely compiled into Linux. This behavioral difference is unexpected and undesirable. When the refault adaptivity of the inactive list was first introduced, there were no statistics at the lruvec level - the intersection of node and memcg - so it was better than nothing. But now that we have that infrastructure, use lruvec_page_state() to make the list balancing decision always NUMA aware. [hannes@cmpxchg.org: fix bisection hole] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190417155241.GB23013@cmpxchg.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190412144438.2645-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org Fixes: 2a2e48854d70 ("mm: vmscan: fix IO/refault regression in cache workingset transition") Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt Cc: Roman Gushchin Cc: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- mm/vmscan.c | 29 +++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 9734e62654fa..144961f6f89c 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2111,7 +2111,6 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, * 10TB 320 32GB */ static bool inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file, - struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct scan_control *sc, bool actual_reclaim) { enum lru_list active_lru = file * LRU_FILE + LRU_ACTIVE; @@ -2132,16 +2131,12 @@ static bool inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file, inactive = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, inactive_lru, sc->reclaim_idx); active = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, active_lru, sc->reclaim_idx); - if (memcg) - refaults = memcg_page_state(memcg, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE); - else - refaults = node_page_state(pgdat, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE); - /* * When refaults are being observed, it means a new workingset * is being established. Disable active list protection to get * rid of the stale workingset quickly. */ + refaults = lruvec_page_state(lruvec, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE); if (file && actual_reclaim && lruvec->refaults != refaults) { inactive_ratio = 0; } else { @@ -2162,12 +2157,10 @@ static bool inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file, } static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan, - struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, - struct scan_control *sc) + struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) { if (is_active_lru(lru)) { - if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, is_file_lru(lru), - memcg, sc, true)) + if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, is_file_lru(lru), sc, true)) shrink_active_list(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc, lru); return 0; } @@ -2267,7 +2260,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, * anonymous pages on the LRU in eligible zones. * Otherwise, the small LRU gets thrashed. */ - if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, memcg, sc, false) && + if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc, false) && lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON, sc->reclaim_idx) >> sc->priority) { scan_balance = SCAN_ANON; @@ -2285,7 +2278,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, * lruvec even if it has plenty of old anonymous pages unless the * system is under heavy pressure. */ - if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, true, memcg, sc, false) && + if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, true, sc, false) && lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE, sc->reclaim_idx) >> sc->priority) { scan_balance = SCAN_FILE; goto out; @@ -2438,7 +2431,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcg(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memc nr[lru] -= nr_to_scan; nr_reclaimed += shrink_list(lru, nr_to_scan, - lruvec, memcg, sc); + lruvec, sc); } } @@ -2505,7 +2498,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcg(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memc * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio. */ - if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, memcg, sc, true)) + if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc, true)) shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON); } @@ -2830,12 +2823,8 @@ static void snapshot_refaults(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg, pg_data_t *pgdat) unsigned long refaults; struct lruvec *lruvec; - if (memcg) - refaults = memcg_page_state(memcg, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE); - else - refaults = node_page_state(pgdat, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE); - lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(pgdat, memcg); + refaults = lruvec_page_state(lruvec, WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE); lruvec->refaults = refaults; } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root_memcg, memcg, NULL))); } @@ -3183,7 +3172,7 @@ static void age_active_anon(struct pglist_data *pgdat, do { struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(pgdat, memcg); - if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, memcg, sc, true)) + if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc, true)) shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON); -- 2.20.1