Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3362245yba; Mon, 6 May 2019 23:16:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEQDVHSlSzNlRw2QEnybZQD8ctoWvzE5J2ishj0NShB752ZiRHGRSg7RZGl6oSRMks1bKH X-Received: by 2002:a63:541d:: with SMTP id i29mr37320401pgb.174.1557209781004; Mon, 06 May 2019 23:16:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557209780; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eOVSvewZIlWmRImHCxlYG6NOL6Gc+67IQQ52KpcKKo9Ly1q8QKGblHnan8rrmpOdjR jihlAn48V7XNgeAF1y3kKFEb6Lh3REmsNFDfQx4fukJee9IOTR6x8OpNHOoSboNZMfMh JdsLsOyD5jjd/etzuKIE/JXfk/aoR5wJojuvReSdY1f41ME67NRzFJWSvJSW6iGlxSla taaSLGUPNLheAXFyNWGiiJQcbaqplsOJQcr5GIBMrAai0yyOOK7RfbpnRTBpYsQvnI1h DORqnftMLcFf4U2+n74rQwQbfBgc3L2uv/eW/mz4+kDEroJHa9+dvq65VDShW9AbHxWN KjyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=rUkopSZotbELjC7owtPyRjHNKJ3xdDhDqSCz9ET9utg=; b=gaNbgR65vKQfXpb1H2TBnl9pVm9mSIAtV1oj0mHjV/UflbyS7J/qVnHWE9NLBuqL5p 37Mo3ntKH8zk3d+HUbPlZrvk2561q2WyI7oIx8UqYboBoju9FKqHGDfxY0HAdLxWehEQ FphvvW1kGlh7fYUIZ3uJkL0w+KWCRz+8035zWrhuoeUsvZCQCNk4p0X0pbjz6vkpUwS6 5sdgGUC0yHYHCg++zVtyY1Mk07dMcgWXeUmDBiHarsUdR+7t0NN8khApkPZHY3Qny359 sskr4MrSJvZpyRSBEqm0lntx86iVtqlZxsLungn7yUU7BJ4VNyB/9hJJaOvnbWHsNQRv A1uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=AS1BO+Qb; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="i7ncgJF/"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cd3si20130430plb.98.2019.05.06.23.16.05; Mon, 06 May 2019 23:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=AS1BO+Qb; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="i7ncgJF/"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726414AbfEGGPP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 May 2019 02:15:15 -0400 Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.229]:58495 "EHLO new3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726253AbfEGGPP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 02:15:15 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341441601A; Tue, 7 May 2019 02:15:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 May 2019 02:15:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=rUkopSZotbELjC7owtPyRjHNKJ3 xdDhDqSCz9ET9utg=; b=AS1BO+QbYPt06V80kSVUyssGF4Ba2f9z0Yh9quhHxX7 zrTPAu78fNvUrbRquynL/OWR/4IEEMzcBsbZpmAu/T4N0OQWXP2TbpaZL/67OAhQ AMamKUBgCjwff5oVKKTOEy6EwglIpjt3hdXh9xMBRCkVveX7JxHP6YYZsqz+B7yJ /AulUBJNufJAwBfc1oRE1bbq/iVhrAXm2F2mxOyJ86zthq+zNVT6L7PBGqcM3XDA yLpCCiHazFsBS6/rBZ9253l7AbuuRSLqZUDSY38j0Cm7YKPDX8d7WnnOEwd3Zsp4 H0iMIUQe9hopOSO2NoJT8PcIXgNSVkduzqx39088lJQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=rUkopS ZotbELjC7owtPyRjHNKJ3xdDhDqSCz9ET9utg=; b=i7ncgJF/yfrNdTLwnNSNGZ uPVA6ji2AnBVDI9n0r1y8pCK2yJNpSm7dQviwp0p4pawb8AQa9Vbho1pjtq0d9w6 SthRziw6x+GHcMq7GS4kSzIn2isTqgz2I+FZYAL17RIsTws3jDF0qX4BU8Vw2DuY vrtCY+9WMmoOVmqv0UNVszGHh3+7HZxrUemQS8arYvwnDGndOxPKYPyxdBAX0NA2 dVQzxz6Kebs3eu/f1S4gDNexxDJNCUv0wNXPIxfSqq1NkF/SBe99LBCL2fPaM/jE qMqjvpS1OMdgFqqsG41aexJD8oPWgSd8N1d+1k/8U7Y6puDsF2Nol6M61BfKJMGg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrjeelgddutdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghg ucfmjfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomheqnecukfhppeekfedrkeeirdekledrud dtjeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 813DDE4693; Tue, 7 May 2019 02:15:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 08:15:03 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dan Williams , Geert Uytterhoeven , Ingo Molnar , Matthew Wilcox , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , x86-ml , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 79/95] x86/asm: Remove dead __GNUC__ conditionals Message-ID: <20190507061503.GA20385@kroah.com> References: <20190507053826.31622-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20190507053826.31622-79-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 07:57:01AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 07/05/2019 07.38, Sasha Levin wrote: > > From: Rasmus Villemoes > > > > [ Upstream commit 88ca66d8540ca26119b1428cddb96b37925bdf01 ] > > > > The minimum supported gcc version is >= 4.6, so these can be removed. > > Eh, that bump happened for the 4.19 kernel, so this is not true for the > 4.14 branch. Has cafa0010cd51fb711fdcb50fc55f394c5f167a0a been applied > to 4.14.y? Otherwise I don't think this is appropriate. No, that commit is not in 4.14, so we still have to "support" older versions of gcc there :( Sasha, can you drop this? thanks, greg k-h