Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:27:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:27:10 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:17679 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:26:58 -0400 Subject: Re: i845 anybody? To: igor.mozetic@uni-mb.si (Igor Mozetic) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 21:32:42 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <15292.5448.370039.388516@cmb1-3.dial-up.arnes.si> from "Igor Mozetic" at Oct 04, 2001 09:52:40 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Has anybody had any success/problems with i845 based mobo? > Low-end Pentium IV + a lot of SDRAM seems a good deal at the moment. i845 doesnt have DDR support, so if you want high memory bandwidth you might want to look elsewhere. > Alternatively, I was considering Athlon + VIA 133A, but I have > noticed a number of reported problems on this list. > Any comments/suggestions appreciated. I think its fair to say we understand the VIA chipset problems, then IDE stuff is dealt with. The athlon optimsation problem is also something with a known cure. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/