Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 16:02:54 +0100
From:   Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To:     luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] sched/dl: Capacity-aware migrations
Message-ID: <20190507150251.lhsnc3t7uz66gufv@queper01-lin>
References: <20190506044836.2914-1-luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
 <20190506044836.2914-3-luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
 <20190507141048.d45ia7qfytnfdhqc@queper01-lin>
 <20190507164127.00cbaaec@nowhere>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190507164127.00cbaaec@nowhere>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday 07 May 2019 at 16:41:27 (+0200), luca abeni wrote:
> I think I added this modification because I arrived to the conclusion
> that schedutils does not perform this rescaling (at least, I think it
> did not perform it when I wrote the patch :)

Right, I'm not sure what was the behaviour before, but schedutil should
actually do that scaling now, though pretty far down the line (see
map_util_freq()). So I think we're good on that end ;-)

Thanks,
Quentin