Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190422162652.15483-1-kasong@redhat.com> <20190423113501.GN11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CACPcB9f8JuALCw1i-V2N01GuTQRfjrCya6esOTM8dGwvf+oT7w@mail.gmail.com> <20190424125212.GN12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190424125212.GN12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 09:45:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJLLCQJoV8Qg+0D4_-mE8hLmrEYz91Jy0kT2Qgkb1evtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] perf/x86: make perf callchain work without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:52 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:42:40AM -0400, Kairui Song wrote:
>
> > Sure, the updated comments looks much better. Will the maintainer
> > squash the comment update or should I send a V5?
>
> I've squashed it, I've just not gotten around to stuffing it a git tree
> yet. Should happen 'soon'.

Was it applied and on the way to Linus yet ?