Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4075654yba; Tue, 7 May 2019 11:41:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxSVFzOHHYgZZJlA1Cj5OyLR1gkmQznVKo6Eftqmi+8L2vn3R/LwWYhWugGzdIAB/QXWQ/P X-Received: by 2002:a62:4183:: with SMTP id g3mr44044890pfd.229.1557254468365; Tue, 07 May 2019 11:41:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557254468; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KMU1c8OyPmJMYB7g/hR2LctS/7xQlofqEU/xKBq4VH3jTYcp7zd3bdRloZ8v4p9lX9 6YJQNpWZ5VDRguTZszPLkW5k0pudUOMTsu29vjtLuJ9CXz6Xhp9af8E2WNXYPEI3YAim Wd+jVBFcK9m4t4ZhQSGhd7AOB0jfJCAmcOyEIHiH2XanoQnQEXigIMdLk5vimy8B0Vpk voLW+OrzwdE9sYxX6n0+XprID4tuMwAP3J2rFDDUHEPefPrUHI94qwmeCgmFo+6bR8F8 jhwPqhTFHnWSEmzXdcb8h0JvvwTxeD6vnqNe07D5tj2INcjgzvhHMiY8/qTPnPgXvXmT AfuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=6ha4TvK1nBUnsPWxdsbjlDPyZh819YBxf34Nph3LP10=; b=K9+eiywCjODSaoQm1MdA2YZVIW+UgVfRHPGd15mmaC8mVR2qrqKfGhshEjMyPP5frE xuqhALqdOufQDn6hWV85n114RVQV4hiGOoquhkErpeTovtt32cDF/HuMURTr80CYe0iH eF0ly5WNvw/YEiX8qzPemCcxXFW8LAbvzSQ93Q8U6fYCkfMMYsBrl+ZqpCsz/aovR/F6 Oalt2PDgSrw0txW8GNjnk4dGG0n49519ipNWpski1mJXPArupn0IuvUkwkWlr7EeXNUd 0fKs4zJ/7NsuuDbC6ogCPAFBzXpHoOKgEfLqcG+c4A16oHn49XlH7W+7IiHbyt3SmuS3 QCEw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="m9PeB/nV"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k1si18113543pgq.219.2019.05.07.11.40.52; Tue, 07 May 2019 11:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="m9PeB/nV"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727779AbfEGSjd (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 May 2019 14:39:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:52104 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727023AbfEGSjd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 14:39:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id o189so10832215wmb.1 for ; Tue, 07 May 2019 11:39:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6ha4TvK1nBUnsPWxdsbjlDPyZh819YBxf34Nph3LP10=; b=m9PeB/nVcFG8IBBf2K7WNaroHWM8hSErZv+Gjf0Qelb/621k777REskBflS4n35GYJ IRm5yBNsX5fqiKm92io4KytZN+lGZ2e9Goo1VA9zzPQ3X9P3eNEIbnWyeRVcDwmOCt6Z yyZM2czZJqEzciV5K+hUF/5AZNghdu15sE98tcxqPFv+yJ0dYZiImd6+cF+ey07WfKr3 LRw1QdkblKD8v7jhNbKMESECWVR+tcXvwEjwX32KGNSTkRsHjic26AajF5+46m1IZ+5D bU4Z2QJgkb2AccN5qoQxeFNnYFqSrQadWnBvKMMIPFooNgexVekcv4RUjwjQIyyLfOTa V6wQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6ha4TvK1nBUnsPWxdsbjlDPyZh819YBxf34Nph3LP10=; b=XyiQ1GUmV3+Hp3mS9n8SGaDNEaKa4E/vHNLHNFmSXuB+IyIKZbXW10xv+WynnBxw3G 1oyZKRZ9uzUCASgl6RCjYjA+X5f0UuP1xtIGiF7Z2fC5zl24tkeFPyF6ACrxRE9OYtdr FfI2xcpSy4zb2W6NmxDRrMqLiWHIqhSTM3t/lP6eZNHBTX1uodddyVYyTjzKnI2GKUmH jj1DEZ6QND7o6/c70DZjWcWKTHieNdTAluzmR2tXJ20ej9ktDahoCd0T7rmvADo1mlen j1Me3g9ls3DAp525w0rnqx0QQio3AZ4AQ7InjqInn0TVLeGGVP7qji9LJ2Jvyd1lPgbI +3kg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsogOlFoL2mgdtmVjvvcg4KRBwwRZ9Wz1KLRFSejWoSTDbqLmc EwEHz8Cq/nuoF4MncAIGuxg= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2d91:: with SMTP id t139mr23229494wmt.102.1557254370721; Tue, 07 May 2019 11:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm6784321wrt.81.2019.05.07.11.39.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 May 2019 11:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 20:39:27 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Kairui Song , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Josh Poimboeuf , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Dave Young Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] perf/x86: make perf callchain work without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER Message-ID: <20190507183927.GA58030@gmail.com> References: <20190422162652.15483-1-kasong@redhat.com> <20190423113501.GN11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190424125212.GN12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190507165743.GX2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190507165743.GX2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 09:45:47AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:52 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:42:40AM -0400, Kairui Song wrote: > > > > > > > Sure, the updated comments looks much better. Will the maintainer > > > > squash the comment update or should I send a V5? > > > > > > I've squashed it, I've just not gotten around to stuffing it a git tree > > > yet. Should happen 'soon'. > > > > Was it applied and on the way to Linus yet ? > > AFAICT it has already landed in Linus' tree. Yeah, it's now the following commit upstream: d15d356887e7: perf/x86: Make perf callchains work without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER Thanks, Ingo