Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4269925yba; Tue, 7 May 2019 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgEjMHbVhTF7NmLEY0qbPL59FN5JRva5+XOKJDuiD30QNOudGF9mxVnfE+AIi4JVixtEnm X-Received: by 2002:a62:14d6:: with SMTP id 205mr44093502pfu.4.1557267523225; Tue, 07 May 2019 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557267523; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l8UsJKJFY6/5lPacMuG+6aPO5TsvPsrMrRIcbOOjfUGG6qJQhRF7iCvbCjqTKQOJtT Jh/V2glQb81zulbHDP2HN9Ab2Ud8B44gO6mpSUHBxRu4LY7KbcN5wadZBX/JkcpYH4fg kDeqPPVwdOT/76wl9I2eYykisavuJcOd25ja5AWCbdNVHN+Mw0T2njkNmicaCaT/8c/6 eAQKU7f0A8nmdUd11wj9f5eiN8DJvVSP4rQpaWUbVcv7mymlUq2FBW2XG2mHiVAIWnYi aIQGq5tNOfvLNRxXrKGRZh7VFj5gNfxVovc1i7oarQJSdmRn1W+My6JzTpsyvrKvW0B6 eoyw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:date; bh=Nt/3+vun1GY6mbHxBZan9jgE7EGmgVhvJeZorqnMA3M=; b=dAVc/GSNPiVG3I7PXQVS4d+9ljsfGkOAY2eSVkNngtLsMaDp7fH5jicc1jo7e+lOSN GsxNM5UZUoyjkXnJNn2Tpa2Se9l2cxe4IDiHTITgS0H5eJFHJ/r4Tb+uXeBRH5hw1E1c xxElwzpHRg/fcacLS3pIHH9WdkqPezWR2jfF3LMNug8c2bDXYG3rvq/mLcZvptnrQtIQ RG3nBgydhFtPMuC/StJJIt2PDWaHc7Hu9hMZFiXEIMB6RoAaN14AJCse0uFTi15WVeuv ZeS077zRQf08Pz0oechMhMN689dJZBcH+poB0zvk7d7XSuBRvabhRNaateL0GIN4VOky n+/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f69si16140246pff.118.2019.05.07.15.18.27; Tue, 07 May 2019 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726336AbfEGWRe (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 May 2019 18:17:34 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:54606 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725843AbfEGWRe (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 18:17:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x47MHHhv112796 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:17:32 -0400 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sbfbn806y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 07 May 2019 18:17:32 -0400 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 7 May 2019 23:17:32 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e12.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.199) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 7 May 2019 23:17:29 +0100 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x47MGDPM29163620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 May 2019 22:16:13 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E6CB2087; Tue, 7 May 2019 22:16:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA94B2085; Tue, 7 May 2019 22:16:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.216]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 7 May 2019 22:16:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EDA816C1E98; Tue, 7 May 2019 15:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 15:16:13 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com Subject: Re: Question about sched_setaffinity() Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com References: <20190427180246.GA15502@linux.ibm.com> <20190430100318.GP2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190430105129.GA3923@linux.ibm.com> <20190430115551.GT2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190501191213.GX3923@linux.ibm.com> <20190501151655.51469a4c@gandalf.local.home> <20190501202713.GY3923@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190501202713.GY3923@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19050722-0060-0000-0000-0000033C7253 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011068; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000285; SDB=6.01200063; UDB=6.00629637; IPR=6.00980945; MB=3.00026778; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-05-07 22:17:30 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19050722-0061-0000-0000-00004942CFD9 Message-Id: <20190507221613.GA11057@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-07_13:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905070139 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 03:16:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Wed, 1 May 2019 12:12:13 -0700 > > "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > > > > > > OK, what I did was to apply the patch at the end of this email to -rcu > > > branch dev, then run rcutorture as follows: > > > > > > nohup tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 8 --duration 2 --configs "TRIVIAL" --bootargs "trace_event=sched:sched_switch,sched:sched_wakeup ftrace=function_graph ftrace_graph_filter=sched_setaffinity,migration_cpu_stop" > > > > > > This resulted in the console output that I placed here: > > > > > > http://www2.rdrop.com/~paulmck/submission/console.log.gz > > > > > > But I don't see calls to sched_setaffinity() or migration_cpu_stop(). > > > Steve, is something else needed on the kernel command line in addition to > > > the following? > > > > > > ftrace=function_graph ftrace_graph_filter=sched_setaffinity,migration_cpu_stop > > > > Do you have function graph enabled in the config? > > > > [ 2.098303] ftrace bootup tracer 'function_graph' not registered. > > I guess I don't! Thank you, will fix. > > Let's see... > > My .config has CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER=y. It looks like I > need CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER=y, which I don't have. And it looks > like that needs CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y, which I also don't have. > But I do have CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER=y. So I should add this > to my rcutorture command line: > > --kconfig "CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER=y". > > I fired this up. Here is hoping! ;-) > > And it does have sched_setaffinity(), woo-hoo!!! I overwrote the old file: > > http://www2.rdrop.com/~paulmck/submission/console.log.gz And I reran after adding a trace_printk(), which shows up as follows: [ 211.409565] 6) | /* On unexpected CPU 6, expected 4!!! */ I placed the console log here: http://www2.rdrop.com/~paulmck/submission/console.tpk.log.gz Just in case the earlier log proves useful. And it is acting as if the destination CPU proved to be offline. Except that this rcutorture scenario doesn't offline anything, and I don't see any CPU-hotplug removal messages. So I added another trace_printk() to print out cpu_online_mask. This gets me the following: [ 31.565605] 0) | /* On unexpected CPU 0, expected 1!!! */ [ 31.565605] 0) | /* Online CPUs: 0-7 */ So we didn't make it to CPU 1 despite its being online. I placed the console log here: http://www2.rdrop.com/~paulmck/submission/console.tpkol.log.gz Thoughts? Updated patch against -rcu below in case it is useful. Thanx, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c index da04b5073dc3..23ec8ec7eddd 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c @@ -680,12 +680,24 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops tasks_ops = { static void synchronize_rcu_trivial(void) { int cpu; + int destcpu; + static int dont_trace; for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { - while (raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu) - rcutorture_sched_setaffinity(current->pid, - cpumask_of(cpu)); - WARN_ON_ONCE(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu); + if (!READ_ONCE(dont_trace)) + tracing_on(); + rcutorture_sched_setaffinity(current->pid, cpumask_of(cpu)); + destcpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); + if (destcpu == cpu) { + tracing_off(); + } else { + trace_printk("On unexpected CPU %d, expected %d!!!\n", destcpu, cpu); + trace_printk("Online CPUs: %*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_online_mask)); + tracing_stop(); + WRITE_ONCE(dont_trace, 1); + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + rcu_ftrace_dump(DUMP_ALL); + } } } diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index caffee644932..edaf0ca22ff7 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -3495,6 +3495,7 @@ void __init rcu_init(void) rcu_par_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_par_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0); WARN_ON(!rcu_par_gp_wq); srcu_init(); + tracing_off(); } #include "tree_stall.h"