Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4995359yba; Wed, 8 May 2019 06:22:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz37be59YyjDOgR9sssMuHxUMYtwPXpxtiwCg/7ZeTq8KbS+QNfVFu3ks7KFXK/6ezLeuF3 X-Received: by 2002:a62:1d83:: with SMTP id d125mr47466134pfd.74.1557321769348; Wed, 08 May 2019 06:22:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557321769; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iCFi14HB7cKsNYcE+rvVpsFS6o1QKgC2xsCeq4aySHV+a4uAu9vpukK3dq9dWNNno6 i1yw0E+ByLsVB4jqHWaD3kbp40GYVO5+Xf1EF59l8RbrF2D02bo7PDtBCO0nLvw/4o9K X627qA3C9zkACC+Dh3u3dv5OaCVVs6cHMrEGiQOqrRBG4vrODAtzgDlocw9RVtZ5Edje 0g2PfVLbdlaTfC1/Y0nvBaSE7ewvoDIemeunb47jTIG03dXeiLRHkMrfjp3ApcKsXP57 tF0CWHo3cgxDImLJqnqwnrNc9/zp6Mbm6ZOh3167AtM9Dxyej95OyBsBXG40udqxyZux CNkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=nTHwo9DVJLcD7fGjbRg4vJvClUja/ALW7Q84XMsZYKk=; b=Jpr0s6+yUm83A3WnTUSWJ14UcyMsg5+9Xn0vo9YNItClxyzTa+KVk5F/L2PoXG2wHU 3oLwFPN32l7jCe4Ln0tdw+27GlKhGIJu2NEXPIzgpMqoVD7Y3O/cIbWyMAZbQZBLEfnt eHT2RUo0DUdmkIgi2GjbMmE2SyMPauhj2f9DqPAbPvtqiE4RX2TowzIN2BeXaBtivZw1 4qu6UsC/MTXhtySTlvZkivKfZDkG2Qo9AX9B4I0UfAsRDTbWkLUCEi/kjewIgitkYUe1 rh1DUnZ4xiOkv6cRkdvQql8TsQokw6Vx/BbQIV824NpRsYJVAg/b7pipa2K7udMx0E91 6xDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a9si22888754pls.395.2019.05.08.06.22.33; Wed, 08 May 2019 06:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728407AbfEHMCA (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 May 2019 08:02:00 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:22852 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727623AbfEHMCA (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2019 08:02:00 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2019 05:01:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from mattu-haswell.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.164]) ([10.237.72.164]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2019 05:01:57 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: host: xhci: Support running urb giveback in tasklet context To: Suwan Kim Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org References: <20190401141611.10087-1-suwan.kim027@gmail.com> <20190507160219.GB2427@localhost.localdomain> From: Mathias Nyman Message-ID: <0529be1d-57d6-18b8-6f62-49f4b3931e1a@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 15:04:33 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190507160219.GB2427@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7.5.2019 19.02, Suwan Kim wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:16:11PM +0900, Suwan Kim wrote: >> Patch "USB: HCD: support giveback of URB in tasklet context"[1] >> introduced giveback of urb in tasklet context. [1] This patch was >> applied to ehci but not xhci. [2] This patch significantly reduces >> the hard irq time of xhci. Especially for uvc driver, the hard irq >> including the uvc completion function runs quite long but applying >> this patch reduces the hard irq time of xhci. >> > > I sent this patch a month ago but got no answer. > Is there any feedback for this? > Please let me know if there are any faults or it needs more tests. > I'll add this to a internal tree first, and let it sit there for a few weeks, trying to catch possible bugs this change could expose. -Mathias