Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751110AbVKJA0m (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:26:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751111AbVKJA0m (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:26:42 -0500 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:46346 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751110AbVKJA0m (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:26:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:08:28 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.32-rc3 Message-ID: <20051110000828.GA19211@alpha.home.local> References: <20051109133216.GA9183@logos.cnet> <20051109185223.GA4047@stusta.de> <20051109141530.GA9332@logos.cnet> <20051109231123.GA18858@alpha.home.local> <20051109235314.GF4047@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051109235314.GF4047@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1643 Lines: 38 On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:53:14AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:11:23AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Adrian, hi Marcelo, > > > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:15:31PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > (...) > > > > If there will be one more -rc, could you include my airo_cs fix? > > > > > > Hi Adrian, > > > > > > I think it can wait for the next -pre... Hope there wont be another -rc. > > > > So do I. Moreover, -pre should start with several network-related fixes, > > so your fix might find a comfortable place there :-) > > > > I will release another -hf with recent fixes. I noticed I missed three of > > them from 2.4.32-rc2 (I thought I was up to date but they showed up just > > before the announcement). They are the memleak in sd_mod, the TCP snd_wnd > > fix and the fix for the infinite loop in udp_v6_get_port(). So I can also > > merge your fix early if you want (I already queued it for later inclusion). > > I generally try to avoid including fixes that are not much transversal, > > but I read in your patch that the bug you fixed could cause side effects > > to any parts in the kernel, so if you feel it's appropriate for -hf, I'll > > trust you :-) > > I'd say the big advantage of my patch is that although it's hard to see > the bug it fixes, it's easy to see that it can't break anything. Agreed, will include it in -hf9. Cheers, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/