Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp529230yba; Thu, 9 May 2019 01:44:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTejWHEtAmmHubVfmtHjDFS31m4ZwlChmxI0Kew86Uf9jnBqL9gwlE52sbP4UHglUlez9F X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:cc:: with SMTP id e12mr3288779pfj.207.1557391469543; Thu, 09 May 2019 01:44:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557391469; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MozKDBNtfUcEfdjKgkU36SznXA+VRjDHud763LpZZDk0Jr9RL7zWHfBQO7LxqTiFu3 1uapvpcQFQtl9VEqy4JlDE2PwdDis1yH+JmbvCwXRaTEvHp8+68hSzDQ7OaO4hKB2Lly pdGF8iKpyZ04LEmvURiIemhZpEnba2jUrYF86hoDXkltoNdYiylE+891S+D3dDOqiSkT ljqKZUCMHlnKi4OMdalGYEkNneOgO1NBsl0DHQE1GgYB3jlLUlrLOwZvDJPX18wzYvpI JgRPQXdwqD015jZ2Lcdb3syCBQ2KVSl9JhFrfC9rq64IiHAEXiavFc2i3vsUoTlhW+DC 1h5A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=XbIKDeK17YUAaFQ46z0x5QMyOXUlxFTrI/HypeH02f0=; b=rzEaG3aMS0JMCnSdk1o7Mztv8KhEZ4E20qP8jFBUN7qu4BebgtzUqfB+kdUZf718SV OG1MooKAAS5cul4n9e+QvVwgkOPPdGMGtE24bUSua9ECC7w3XPyC8mveVRSrmcbxoPqN 9QtDl2BKk81qrRnE3DHmebweax7n36kSE7IUqimYg+/8NjAdnXCgwPutr3wOfh9YQct5 QTWpVlNctmoxut0U7/jMKtZcFAZUz2mJ9HtQgPi10k9A3hfCRg2A3Qm1//0e1qi+oIMu POgzAwdxeE+ChexqXx/XcH3y31i1O+YsSGA12qLXxZaxdcIjtI6C9M61lEc9vG2GaZxi rQvg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 23si1767422pfh.2.2019.05.09.01.44.12; Thu, 09 May 2019 01:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726495AbfEIInV (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 May 2019 04:43:21 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:34356 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725991AbfEIInU (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2019 04:43:20 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0A3374; Thu, 9 May 2019 01:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e110439-lin (e110439-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78DEF3F575; Thu, 9 May 2019 01:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 09:43:11 +0100 From: Patrick Bellasi To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps Message-ID: <20190509084311.clpvno6am7bxo5wz@e110439-lin> References: <20190402104153.25404-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190402104153.25404-5-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190508184202.GA32547@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190508184202.GA32547@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08-May 20:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:41:40AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > Add a privileged interface to define a system default configuration via: > > > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_uclamp_util_{min,max} > > Isn't the 'u' in "uclamp" already for util? Yes, right... I've just wanted to keep the same "uclamp" prefix used by all related kernel symbols. But, since that's user-space API we can certainly drop it and go for either: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_clamp_util_{min,max} /proc/sys/kernel/sched_util_clamp_{min,max} Preference? -- #include Patrick Bellasi