Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:21:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:21:14 -0400 Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]:15284 "EHLO mailout01.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:20:57 -0400 Date: 04 Oct 2001 21:28:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8ADlR04Xw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Security question: "Text file busy" overwriting executables but no X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh7 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? In-Reply-To: X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro) wrote on 04.10.01 in : > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > In short, now you need filesystem versioning at a per-page level etc. > > *ding* *ding* *ding* we have a near winner. Remember, folks, Hurd had been > started by people who not only don't understand UNIX, but detest it. > ITS/TWENEX refugees. And semantics in question comes from there - > they had "open and make sure that anyone who tries to modify will get > a new version, leaving one we'd opened unchanged". Sounds to me like it could be done ... *if* you had per-process filesystem snapshot capability. Of course, that's using ICBMs to swat mosquitos. I don't recommend it just for implementing a mmap() flag. MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/