Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:28:04 -0400 Received: from shed.alex.org.uk ([195.224.53.219]:61870 "HELO shed.alex.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:27:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 22:28:17 +0100 From: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Reply-To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel To: mingo@elte.hu, jamal Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kuznetsov , Robert Olsson , Benjamin LaHaise , netdev@oss.sgi.com, Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Simon Kirby , Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Message-ID: <302737894.1002234496@[195.224.237.69]> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --On Wednesday, 03 October, 2001 4:51 PM +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > your refusal to accept this problem as an existing and real problem is > really puzzling me. In at least one environment known to me (router), I'd rather it kept accepting packets, and f/w'ing them, and didn't switch VTs etc. By dropping down performance, you've made the DoS attack even more successful than it would otherwise have been (the kiddie looks at effect on the host at the end). -- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/