Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1106853yba; Thu, 9 May 2019 10:50:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDEbAhz/swHU8PEm0fppOk+mmoTOqapR5fPLQ4k3mScvIb7pDybVHo6gAtEfTRZes8zLiS X-Received: by 2002:a63:e048:: with SMTP id n8mr7357762pgj.41.1557424231316; Thu, 09 May 2019 10:50:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557424231; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KzDuL5oO/LGDqsGTGGz0z8qIXJHXYiqwugpqf+lmSlEZ34lKuXWrX6ilZQyxI2IiNV TS8rkf7dV+h/mm1uhelHQ3O7jQIaz4Sm6B5mWAV/0e+J/lKBvysqC6cqcrlXdDdNl6XV 0SgoqhO9FrOo++l7z4gaT8jAfqRyqSNrzPQ8/u/KTr8nc5+/3emsIMJ04WCGio49xQFW o8mEoIrtnjXgDldgLCMZvA8+5E2QUiRCVqMvdnHz9g2tymSvcddtzxRtg9Sogq+VlzWZ 2O0cokjoWP+7kRKZsDzLWUdmpMvL6Scn/cWegWm3/h+ukHfK0V9JoULKVXBV5UpuYNye 3ZhA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=0/UR7KuBk7jn3GdiXeodrKFMGjiBmRvYd8mwzpA5/pQ=; b=pTThDuaK5Kw/4r4YfnovD6zxHmvB3oVeyZ+8DExJmKzP01FXojqzGKyAr79MhYUBP+ ydqCB4EugpDOJbqpepV0Gii5o7RMUfRoJeTyIxQhhVnpEuYqw+f+S+ms6mAAJv8L/5et KfK/sR130+ly9tJU3uxnVF5FQnJNhvFUvECKaZPyZ/vz7D+ti/hrlnaOja24DU9DhUqB ZHdVeALhdJfzwB05d9DJORwymtyZVBHZ+r95I/+jShGqbtQtS7hqT9Dh8wa1b3jq07PX lCokdnen4hy/EYUaZDMmt2GXgieB77lWnlbCohP+NGhxwU1LX5oXvL/sTD8UVj72osrx FDyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Lr2gDwCH; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m3si3928620pld.29.2019.05.09.10.50.14; Thu, 09 May 2019 10:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Lr2gDwCH; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726714AbfEIRtM (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 May 2019 13:49:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:32828 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726576AbfEIRtM (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2019 13:49:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id e11so4265285wrs.0; Thu, 09 May 2019 10:49:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0/UR7KuBk7jn3GdiXeodrKFMGjiBmRvYd8mwzpA5/pQ=; b=Lr2gDwCHh+okjR5BMJoyAUcTWx2e7xJCBSFaC2JjpvhMZiM7r0e3wgnMGmmTUWVCeG Zv8nRv/DH1GU3rCUBk71aYdRxzDHb0L67ODR1lbZSr30yncbPJzsTXMTKASFdt/le1f0 5DTT4izNgzSVdFjb/EyfnmphquHq6Z+D71PAJsxsGDj8xVc5tE40SrYHHkF7VA2a6ozG 068Q3H2JF/0Cak9ac+8L5fVCxB+WmdWXVU0+a8XbVtrSKMIzWTt69AZCXLR1glOXWwEo 7hn9l2SkHAtVG1iDv6sPJHk0HTSCkRCCTlCp0ONX5Y6XSD+1JcxuOjEGk8fw1yHvsD3R a5IA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0/UR7KuBk7jn3GdiXeodrKFMGjiBmRvYd8mwzpA5/pQ=; b=jKBYkcvP9HTc/+ythuAEjaTSV36C+OoIedS7hvuFHgOSTAHsHx/LmbmFZeHvuA53zZ 9FxaEiG8zEMJQ4Xb2judJ7qzsQWM8Y5ARiBgrHhSD/CTKotSNAIZynSLgToQXkD6ST6O prK5ntQVqx4bJ7Vh8X+xq5Ps2HWXDiSnwwgIgG+eGpNhsHRLb/kbKZ+h3Tt0FIH0pw1i aw96YOShMNaXn5yB5ESrSndF/CbRzhNcluj7ECntXrWtXaMFzdLMSr8R6C40Qgb11iqk iYoCI+rRuBI7hYZmzAJYNUzlfVjlfdtRQgtphig9yt6lzraHhrjH+WUULJSPpuXFlqHI Dm9A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU2dl77m88PUUPMg6iTXjeerCRQPxMcO2GfpS1ZIpzkcLqQniIr mylUM4stR9E+tFWnQxBItxvKxi7O X-Received: by 2002:a5d:67cb:: with SMTP id n11mr4144109wrw.3.1557424150632; Thu, 09 May 2019 10:49:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.141] ([194.99.104.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k67sm4474383wmb.34.2019.05.09.10.49.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 May 2019 10:49:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Enhance detection of thermal data To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Corentin Chary , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Drake , acpi4asus-user , Platform Driver , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <7acd57fe-604a-a96a-4ca2-a25bc88d6405@gmail.com> <7595c4f0-3dbb-2fe5-4daf-4b9a266f67d7@gmail.com> From: Yurii Pavlovskyi Message-ID: <0d7f6a9e-d508-65ba-9646-39f1d1a42a13@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 19:49:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08.05.19 15:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 1:12 PM Yurii Pavlovskyi > wrote: > >> - if (value == ASUS_WMI_UNSUPPORTED_METHOD || value & 0xFFF80000 >> + if (value == ASUS_WMI_UNSUPPORTED_METHOD || (value & 0xFFF80000) > > Seems like a bug fix and thus should be a separate commit predecessing > the series. The previous one should theoretically work as well, just thought that would help readability, will revert this. >> - else if (attr == &dev_attr_temp1_input.attr) >> - dev_id = ASUS_WMI_DEVID_THERMAL_CTRL; > > I don't see how this change affects the user output or driver > behaviour. Why is it done? > >> - } else if (dev_id == ASUS_WMI_DEVID_THERMAL_CTRL) { > >> + } else if (attr == &dev_attr_temp1_input.attr) { > > So, I don't see why you change this line. > Yes, looking at this patch now I'd guess the refactoring there is really misguided as it adds a lot more code than it removes, will drop it completely and just add a new condition to the current check instead in next version: - /* If value is zero, something is clearly wrong */ - if (!value) + if (!value || value == 1) Thanks, Yurii