Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1888315yba; Fri, 10 May 2019 02:47:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEjtFhwt4rkhTDtVHGk4Qb1dpydr7mnUB7sbA0i8gsa/dBcLtYJpCvz++PmvJAuKFLXaH+ X-Received: by 2002:a63:d908:: with SMTP id r8mr12474289pgg.268.1557481654993; Fri, 10 May 2019 02:47:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557481654; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VNLxipOJOnRkCKL0Sz4M6RpM43TOLeQB6s+wW+qhPYaXKI7lIe+3hFzxer/qdUJtcZ WEcKJX4nlgigAcUswXxVPc48WCiIZgYW+768CCSlI/56Vmwn8TKoUWVjs/wm5DIhAJhi Ekn6oZpVd0yHQ056aplePkxjReGrSy1N5eRaTDjg4ga82Ib6GjOMZESbatj7hRsBZDYM uERpfMit4DYuhgxJ/Wbik+agKv4b6HrLaw0kRdRL5L7QCq05pAVg9NUrwX+bncqTJmG1 NbiYcF6HtK/rCZ2mxJKYHWfYp9ejPZpqRsBt6FQXY8kHL1CtPG+SCeAAYvUVnwaXu3xA A5BQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=ugkAz/KNunAZ7epiBy/qI+GZiJlVJzLPRsO+SNS2VWo=; b=OU6Snc2Uvyja4ik77ApZTnmLpPv8JrHA8KxYzx8fJyFTMzbUzytG2+4tNjvV5NhLRi rKCd3q7QdTzVtBGerqsr76fqjxy4qWf7iFLZkT3o/gL9mTNbSXAgAGyq5s4VQOGqdge6 brX3r2zRnE1MpmdBLomF66JojrM+nmwhSy3z5Ov5ALTMCHzpzVkvcQTq/KfVqPnMl5Fs 3FPbNDZYXTpEmbgB060+wSiV8eZV1wszg8RXWp2PmxKfwcFLU3fjcBwj56GGokBM+7mU 7vy+E/3pMgI/2SYdLv8abbekNCja8q9Jcz9kUOjuafR0lQV356jLjxRl0fuhnZRzPowB DXkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k11si6838869pfa.163.2019.05.10.02.47.18; Fri, 10 May 2019 02:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727255AbfEJJpR (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 May 2019 05:45:17 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:3008 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727048AbfEJJpR (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2019 05:45:17 -0400 Received: from DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 642C15B17988DADC3274; Fri, 10 May 2019 17:45:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.109) by DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 10 May 2019 17:45:15 +0800 Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Fri, 10 May 2019 17:45:14 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't clear CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG To: Jaegeuk Kim , , References: <20190212023343.52215-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <5ee36ad7-9fe9-adcf-0974-5c17fa8d50ee@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 17:45:14 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190212023343.52215-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.103) To dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.109) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/2/12 10:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > If we met this once, let fsck.f2fs clear this only. > Note that, this addresses all the subtle fault injection test. > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > --- > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > index 03fea4efd64b..10a3ada28715 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > @@ -1267,8 +1267,6 @@ static void update_ckpt_flags(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc) > > if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_SKIP_FLUSH)) > __set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG); > - else > - __clear_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG); Jaegeuk, Will below commit fix this issue? Not sure, but just want to check that.. :) f2fs-tools: fix to check total valid block count before block allocation Thanks, > > if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_NEED_REPAIR)) > __set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG); >