Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 10 May 2019 16:13:20 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     Johannes Thumshirn <morbidrsa@gmail.com>,
        linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
        james.morse@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, mpc85xx: Prevent building as a module
Message-ID: <20190510141320.GB29927@zn.tnic>
References: <20190502141941.12927-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
 <20190506065045.GA3901@x250>
 <20190508101238.GB19015@zn.tnic>
 <87o94bvfxm.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
 <20190509145534.GD17053@zn.tnic>
 <20190509180220.GH17053@zn.tnic>
 <87bm0avb03.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87bm0avb03.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 08:50:52PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Yeah that looks better to me. I didn't think about the case where EDAC
> core is modular.
> 
> Do you want me to send a new patch?

Nah, I'll fix it up.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.