Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp2244238yba; Fri, 10 May 2019 08:25:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDY+ysupvCkc3xGV7pjwlyUu8QRs0UIBhVPEzRkmev9ec0Y6tsJP5iOe12zXIxItU2EaQx X-Received: by 2002:a63:2b03:: with SMTP id r3mr13988937pgr.105.1557501957276; Fri, 10 May 2019 08:25:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557501957; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KKECGyZEO5WuAJphhTjkOE/TmLcAdR/uxKNV4wAKVXRzAz7pRnMtA9c7AqQX77QNh1 Wpt+tchVfGfzmZgvqJ1B8jVz0i4D5o7+gNkyrqzzJ6klank0hyqMbrbrs3NvzIHjW5/t 4z/CEaBSESk9vpLmNc0MwD8xG42FRd0TWSuAo3Eygd1SOTKdGu+U6Cyk0EbuOta58y2F 5M1pPSShrEs9p/ebUwtzkjzDI5cEPACzGJTAhXbjq/S+UY19oLKJdXwuSGB3a/w6lPia a2Rt2/iBvkOVLmIwJ6NzQiXJzK70ntlKafWHHqcpaipD8XZUyTH1i9yijxz2e0WETQwi vEyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=l1gSZe9okNZf46+2LC2iuMhAdp1uvFc/xUVFI09XmT0=; b=GuiL1ZsVOUbeVTrl3XvATZQ4KpTaOeDoU8aOaWyRTYnCSWDGYcA4pojUnq9GzjKS6Q ki7MgdbG2uKhEo7NaJZhTQuRUCiCYe95uzNviTWSGa7r8hKLjFz4wP05Par+zRLsMZEj +mFEaEAH1eBh2BChPnKX5C6PsWYsdfyCDvHbk6xa4RDHZrEHo5zeY5B7tolYSMbvp6X9 vgjFdTTl3Cqx7A+6REisVb0Q0+MsAwzV74fVJvcwSyNiXi3hMxeVmh6k3EZ/gNcbDOEF hXOYSwtxrHbLTRifS0uGVKHQDqGxcq44CM0G5v7ztD629W96BK7VtsjS8f6IP5BU8LuH BKpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5si8133127pgm.540.2019.05.10.08.25.40; Fri, 10 May 2019 08:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727905AbfEJORm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 May 2019 10:17:42 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:48510 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727247AbfEJORl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2019 10:17:41 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 451612C5; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 08:17:40 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Tobin C. Harding" Cc: Corey Minyard , Thomas Hellstrom , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Move kref.txt to core-api/kref.rst Message-ID: <20190510081740.1896c318@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190510004104.GA12809@eros.localdomain> References: <20190510001747.8767-1-tobin@kernel.org> <20190510004104.GA12809@eros.localdomain> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 May 2019 10:41:04 +1000 "Tobin C. Harding" wrote: > > I'm always hesitant to do docs patches that seem obvious - is there > > some reason that this was not done previously? Let's just say there's a lot of obvious stuff to do in Documentation/ that nobody has gotten around to doing yet... > > I did this one in preparation for converting kobject.txt, my intent is > > to put kboject.rst in core-api/ also? > > Oh, I should have started on kobject.rst before sending this. It builds > without errors also. The 'conversion' is no more than renaming the > file. > > If this patch is acceptable I can re-spin it as part of a series that > does kobject as well so you don't get merge conflicts in core-api/index That sounds like a fine idea to me. Thanks, jon