Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932112AbVKJT3w (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:29:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751220AbVKJT3w (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:29:52 -0500 Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk ([213.162.97.75]:49354 "EHLO mail.metronet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219AbVKJT3v (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:29:51 -0500 From: Alistair John Strachan To: Mark Lord Subject: Re: New Linux Development Model Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:29:37 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 Cc: pomac@vapor.com, marado@isp.novis.pt, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fawadlateef@gmail.com, hostmaster@ed-soft.at, jerome.lacoste@gmail.com, carlsj@yahoo.com References: <1131500868.2413.63.camel@localhost> <200511100055.58322.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <437362F3.4060401@rtr.ca> In-Reply-To: <437362F3.4060401@rtr.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511101929.37112.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1404 Lines: 34 On Thursday 10 November 2005 15:10, Mark Lord wrote: [snip] > Sure, us kernel folk can cope with all of that (in theory, > though in practice I'm still stuck with 2.6.13 because I haven't > yet gotten working ipw2200 with 2.6.14, with *either* driver). I'm probably asking a silly question here, but presumably you've grabbed ieee80211 1.1.6 and ipw2200 1.0.8 from their respective websites, compiled them, installed them (whilst running 2.6.14) and the resulting driver does not work? > But things just got WAY more complicated for most users of ipw2200. > Sure, they can ignore us and just continue to run their old vendor > kernels. But this means they don't get up-to-date kernels with > bug fixes and security fixes. And more importantly to LKML, > we've now just cut off a potentially large crowd of kernel-testers. > > Ugh. Ugly. I completely agree with this assessment, I was merely defending the "linux development process" which I do not believe to be at fault here. -- Cheers, Alistair. 'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.' Third year Computer Science undergraduate. 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/