Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751200AbVKJTrE@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751200AbVKJTrE (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:47:04 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751204AbVKJTrD
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:47:03 -0500
Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com ([195.54.107.70]:36248 "EHLO
	mxfep01.bredband.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751200AbVKJTrC (ORCPT <rfc822;Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:47:02 -0500
Subject: Re: New Linux Development Model
From: Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com>
Reply-To: pomac@vapor.com
To: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>, marado@isp.novis.pt, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       fawadlateef@gmail.com, hostmaster@ed-soft.at, jerome.lacoste@gmail.com,
       carlsj@yahoo.com
In-Reply-To: <200511101929.37112.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
References: <1131500868.2413.63.camel@localhost>
	 <200511100055.58322.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <437362F3.4060401@rtr.ca>
	 <200511101929.37112.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-32uUkg/KAlaUGABnYNkr"
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:47:39 +0100
Message-Id: <1131652059.14314.18.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1643
Lines: 46


--=-32uUkg/KAlaUGABnYNkr
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 19:29 +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2005 15:10, Mark Lord wrote:
> [snip]
> > But things just got WAY more complicated for most users of ipw2200.
> > Sure, they can ignore us and just continue to run their old vendor
> > kernels.  But this means they don't get up-to-date kernels with
> > bug fixes and security fixes.  And more importantly to LKML,
> > we've now just cut off a potentially large crowd of kernel-testers.
> >
> > Ugh.  Ugly.
>=20
> I completely agree with this assessment, I was merely defending the "linu=
x=20
> development process" which I do not believe to be at fault here.

It isn't, this started as a mail from someone, and was continued because
ipw* and ieee* things was mentioned. I really hope that a newer version
is merged... It can be branded experimental and all... =3D)

--=20
Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net

--=-32uUkg/KAlaUGABnYNkr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDc6Pb7F3Euyc51N8RArSkAJ4tckOUD9j54IjHx8QL/KKiAG1ZgwCfTcgV
EUuCmlngtOsjbXlJRXuGlfE=
=1kBq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-32uUkg/KAlaUGABnYNkr--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/