Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp5062711yba; Mon, 13 May 2019 04:52:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzYadY6WUjzVumAvftzvgXc/eWGTwQMx0bYS3i49MQ1MZ9vcogfhdlCjEo15o07CARzp0rA X-Received: by 2002:a62:7610:: with SMTP id r16mr32359485pfc.69.1557748364250; Mon, 13 May 2019 04:52:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557748364; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tbHw/az6VnzuFnYPINQrqt5rJs4wn9476ENOVaP2pURifu7YwkXdKoWmwXEsTcgnX1 Tt/itLfGG9jmw43HVEVzrvS3oGPWizvZoYYak2Sy8gsu1GB9mFpWpipPZRKtfR1gW/tR C2jMNcGI39aA6udI/agtFsbSBY/c4pahzcaKhPG0UCqUwgsQuVZyeGZS+IK1ciLrqYlI lD2u/tRr5rbE/kPYvs1E1L3vwnBl74MPtBrzpkMDqQBMq224nMSL7sBRcAFHD2eUtst1 wONJG2VHg4zYipajKAu18fwnFgg+0rXy5dWeLneKsC2w+oB9W3tKuGU20HdFTOYjWBIX PHgw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:subject:cc:to:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:from:date :message-id:dkim-signature; bh=h5mgh4KCp63jsksPf9LEb/AYezgTUIq/azbAEZv5xKE=; b=ax9G3V3HTzlWJMXA+xkpW/lK1gx46C+EBbQOxiMBJ5ASRBmXC6Y+dL+rCy0D2pAt5v BryduoVph5b551WxGg5i7s0r0v9W5qIyGvL7IDxYKgFMXbEjY+c0w8TutCUhJGuWGmNn SLkb5pcdBrLRsxIZeaOvfA5/wlEFzYXMyOLjPBe0lNTQYwKBALvn1rhFZFvUMWle2206 1oh/wBewVKFjY1vp/1t9OHwTe56xfEyt5UD0qvEVC9OGvCaL86oWywEuUb0891m2aiSI a9TY0K2Dicaoc1v6nEa9j+LtL/vNPpEEpvbfuBDGJ58ORj6ueYEdbx5qNC1ZU/cfJ7SW ylhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@bfs.de header.s=dkim201901 header.b=KlhpbFtM; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l190si2480986pga.255.2019.05.13.04.52.27; Mon, 13 May 2019 04:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@bfs.de header.s=dkim201901 header.b=KlhpbFtM; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728936AbfEMKNs (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 May 2019 06:13:48 -0400 Received: from mx01-fr.bfs.de ([193.174.231.67]:35600 "EHLO mx01-fr.bfs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727272AbfEMKNr (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2019 06:13:47 -0400 Received: from mail-fr.bfs.de (mail-fr.bfs.de [10.177.18.200]) by mx01-fr.bfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BDA2202D3; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:13:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bfs.de; s=dkim201901; t=1557742420; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h5mgh4KCp63jsksPf9LEb/AYezgTUIq/azbAEZv5xKE=; b=KlhpbFtMT08WmEzekabJJrNbF0LR2M+P3ImvaqOsqMLfInyF0CAv7a5CaDN4nMLcKqpfQW kF0rf5m6UGFheax/OWvvGwQSWrsQQAOds5NNpeIdKhiL4YLdcxj4PUoh3dFuS/ZDzx5dws ZZtoPp8nlzU43Fq9gJDMLrP9Omel3Za6CibOdwRIio2GXJqmcR5MHYeGHArc0eBbb0AJGn UxE4VILzpGilsG6EMyjwKrhhi18JXRYJJSM3qtvMGmRQdxW8EUXJ/ehPnBRYnG5ueIWKyN AFF3WZ6GZvCnyRoMGp4BhEXqiFJmFdFKTpia0GEgijVVCY9jvT21KXIEcBlAkg== Received: from [134.92.181.33] (unknown [134.92.181.33]) by mail-fr.bfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F82BEEBD; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:13:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5CD94353.90702@bfs.de> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 12:13:39 +0200 From: walter harms Reply-To: wharms@bfs.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 SUSE/3.0.11 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Howells CC: jaltman@auristor.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] afs: Fix afs_xattr_get_yfs() to not try freeing an error value References: <5CD8697B.6010004@bfs.de> <5CD844B0.5060206@bfs.de> <155764714099.24080.1233326575922058381.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <155764714872.24080.15171754166782593095.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <31808.1557684645@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <6819.1557691584@warthog.procyon.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <6819.1557691584@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.08 Authentication-Results: mx01-fr.bfs.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.08 / 7.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[wharms@bfs.de]; BAYES_HAM(-2.98)[99.91%]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 12.05.2019 22:06, schrieb David Howells: > walter harms wrote: > >> Sorry, you misunderstood me, my fault, i did not see that size is unsigned. >> NTL i do not think size=0 is useful. > > Allow me to quote from the getxattr manpage: > > If size is specified as zero, these calls return the current size of > the named extended attribute (and leave value unchanged). This can be > used to determine the size of the buffer that should be supplied in a > subsequent call. [...] > ok, sorry for the noise i did not know, for me that look unintended. >> while you are there: >> flags |= YFS_ACL_WANT_ACL is always flags = YFS_ACL_WANT_ACL; >> since flags is 0 at this point. >> IMHO that sould be moved to the strcmp() section. > > Why? It makes the strcmp() section more complicated and means I now either > have to cache flags in a variable or do the allocation of yacl first. > no need to cache, the idea was only to make the correlation between the name and flags more obvious. (no need to hurry, i just noticed it) if (strcmp(name, "acl") == 0) { which = 0; flags = YFS_ACL_WANT_ACL; } else if (strcmp(name, "acl_inherited") == 0) { which = 1; flags = 0; } else if (strcmp(name, "acl_num_cleaned") == 0) { which = 2; flags = 0; } else if (strcmp(name, "vol_acl") == 0) { which = 3; flags = YFS_ACL_WANT_VOL_ACL; } .... re, wh > David >