Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp5220825yba; Mon, 13 May 2019 07:21:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz5wV0iX8B/dxTJEQIIJmQvc+l7RrYIV2zbRc8RYQy5aLqw1vY7FRJCD+moUCNwlc6avWGG X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7c90:: with SMTP id y16mr31554149pll.309.1557757315653; Mon, 13 May 2019 07:21:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557757315; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=M8hBILYR+ZAO0paGLltw0A67d/56Bhuk1HtpdM86VUzEtBFG/j4FLqBdlgs2CJ9jCo 9TaZukNHnWRqNTlU7uxgxBtmn9KvABh5QBCMjudKTLC/MAyWxh33j44HF8+Dwy+/lzV/ Fzw244RbMHAwS8KZAqdpRwK+gFvO0Yfr84YNvMkBG1xbBino+rCeEmH39MePQvt2A4jq ZXeGQagzz1pQXVIy+TVZcDLFVCxnrjzDEPj9UIxXCTDLGovARdgcpMHviv/5IBEWZL3o LTlyVqwlshdUCEgsSWH0VzCi1dSNuWz9J5v8maqwj395uqUQS8JpXT+A79Ipi2a82IR3 LlOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=lYOeCtkWRF1MzWRAO38WWTsL/d29K5c9jjoVG41iPnM=; b=AYJYw+z1NYnzcF1nRJfhRULMwcbPnE2HWVpONx6nItuj6LshOb+uAcWD9qxxbLinRb /oPGvGRTc7DFbpOXqooOGw5quPn+eLr94is/4ddGNbb+GXUOYsXHlZqJi0RPSvP6Hx8f qZBdAT3uKU5y9hthvxZs1eM+wxmKSu48zc8sYPxMzJ/NFWv4s85+5NtiiHZGJEUznL42 LhVlYcc1lF1t/24w7KHha3slVQG3+YX96Ll/HeNGhxaIXfbMf8COv01rV0uEEy2dfrJi atJ6BnBT4vtrbIBwVb9iDGVI2m4OGRkJc/rvMHNEQk6ofX5+fnDz3O1Sf2OmBMYYc88D /MOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w3si15485615plz.68.2019.05.13.07.21.39; Mon, 13 May 2019 07:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729904AbfEMNwx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 May 2019 09:52:53 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:56538 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729452AbfEMNwx (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2019 09:52:53 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB6680D; Mon, 13 May 2019 06:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.195.43] (e107049-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63A453F71E; Mon, 13 May 2019 06:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PM list , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , quentin.perret@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, Dietmar Eggemann , rjw@rjwysocki.net References: <20190508174301.4828-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com> From: Douglas Raillard Organization: ARM Message-ID: <054f34d5-1b88-9337-501f-321519f5d27c@arm.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 14:52:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB-large Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Viresh, Rafael, On 5/13/19 8:12 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:57 PM wrote: >> >> From: Douglas RAILLARD >> >> Make schedutil cpufreq governor energy-aware. > > Hi Douglas, > > I was wondering on why the cpufreq maintainers weren't cc'd for this set and > then I noticed that get_maintainers doesn't report us at all for schedutil :( > > I have sent a patch to fix that, but please include us as well in the > future even > if get_maintainers doesn't report us :) Looks like it was a mix of me not checking my checklist and get_maintainers not catching it, I'll make sure both of you are in CC next time :) > > -- > viresh Thanks, Douglas