Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp5533121yba; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxrYRg6gUewppPxkyzgQXiqCCCsCXSHD6MWGLB3Qt6sVllrQKn6fzMh69ECVJovpGEVMLBX X-Received: by 2002:a62:83c8:: with SMTP id h191mr16146056pfe.251.1557775957680; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557775957; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YME2hivL9ui3DfxXIGLXZXliFaqnfIPhrR45if6PYLIDQ7WZd6g6HIuC3zDFZQSM5z KoT33JtfFOGNJHUWNcoK3+hwaC9TRWCGyRAAcKWSCkuUSaApwwQ+TBeCq4oTvsezeodH 01AdoeZwPmMWesg+BzyysWEWaine6iq/pJLAsZmdFX8I4G6zD6V1Wgjn8Mof5Vbe5zHN 9+t6HdtXKkKnLt7cgPuZoU8dDcaqdU+RU0bv/GCzWLtKOx810cOWtRdIfX4zHiHRphUG fZdkVUyeoJvDi4/Tio2lrwgXb60+SSQ58LAusfnPVsjbGEuazyamHJ9XWiaQuM6dYc9t I9Jg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:content-id:mime-version :comments:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=FMAQqxuZkxbeoBHrjDvCa0MXe7GpGrEkZ/Gj7K+2BiI=; b=yiMW7hETpOGGJ6aearwxQpNeoRETsEWpHmSbfI/Bdytn6Y1zDuklWSTxqZqTvyyDni BpsQWcpM/PBzMs9pPR9Dl0EGFtOljHYsKfXCt2pqjxaU7omKt93T8WIDp0ZzI8t5zIV0 J9SSj2rB/u0/3LWlsA2j4fQzjESFEuSRlwXcePshuOGyuy38O8AnBqsDVo2zgRr+2PuE Dm8XJBhKHEG5lcZN9pUN14Zc4DdTIoRmo/tzigptzmEhoR7NHAOF0TtQMTpxlu9mIQY2 3cbNWy7KvKwgPE2nX4qlnSGh4nAA1b2SZxIx5zlW7bGbS5Gyq0xbD4DbKYM71fzk/taQ jOWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u5si17652243pgc.472.2019.05.13.12.32.21; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731291AbfEMRKZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 May 2019 13:10:25 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:50755 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731261AbfEMRKZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2019 13:10:25 -0400 Received: from c-67-160-6-8.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([67.160.6.8] helo=famine.localdomain) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1hQET0-0005K9-0o; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:10:22 +0000 Received: by famine.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 000C75FF13; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from famine (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by famine.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5F6A6E12; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:10:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Jay Vosburgh To: David Miller cc: jarod@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vfalico@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: fix arp_validate toggling in active-backup mode In-reply-to: <20190513.094632.2251179341102416171.davem@davemloft.net> References: <26675.1557528809@famine> <2033e768-9e35-ac89-c526-4c28fc3f747e@redhat.com> <6720.1557765810@famine> <20190513.094632.2251179341102416171.davem@davemloft.net> Comments: In-reply-to David Miller message dated "Mon, 13 May 2019 09:46:32 -0700." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 27.0.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7471.1557767419.1@famine> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 10:10:19 -0700 Message-ID: <7472.1557767419@famine> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: >From: Jay Vosburgh >Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 09:43:30 -0700 > >> That would be my preference, as the 29c4948293bf commit looks to >> be the change actually being fixed. > >Sorry I pushed the original commit message out :-( > >But isn't the Fixes: tag he choose the one where the logic actually >causes problems? That's kind of my real criteria for Fixes: tags. I don't think so. It looks like the problem being fixed here (clearing recv_probe when we shouldn't) was introduced at 29c4948293bf, but was not the only place the same problem existed. 3fe68df97c7f fixed the other occurrences of this problem, but missed the specific one added by 29c4948293bf, which is now fixed by this patch. In any event, both of the commits in question are old enough that it's kind of moot, as -stable will presumably get the right thing regardless. -J --- -Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com