Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6f53f0e494d743c79e18f6e3a98085711e6ddd0c.1557177585.git.len.brown@intel.com>
 <9f57786ba08d4d5e913cd21693aadb0ccdba72b2.1557177585.git.len.brown@intel.com> <06e134aa-943a-dff9-4d33-e0bc8449f284@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <06e134aa-943a-dff9-4d33-e0bc8449f284@linux.intel.com>
From:   Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 May 2019 13:29:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKndJAkp1q2mf1mamgFns+b8q-Q_u0--TduoH3dpdPk6BA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] perf/x86/intel/rapl: rename internal variables in
 response to multi-die/pkg support
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:04 AM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> The perf rapl "pmu" in the code is cross the pkg/die. We only register
> one rapl pmu for whole system for now.
> I think it may be better use "die" to replace the "pkg" as well.
> How about the patch as below?

Fine with me!
I've replaced my patch with yours in the series.

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center