Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6f53f0e494d743c79e18f6e3a98085711e6ddd0c.1557177585.git.len.brown@intel.com>
 <a1ab2f32d8d99f0561ae5e2ce3337d48f1b6f66e.1557177585.git.len.brown@intel.com> <aef058a6-cdc9-cd86-cbba-ff96c59ef84d@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <aef058a6-cdc9-cd86-cbba-ff96c59ef84d@linux.intel.com>
From:   Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 May 2019 13:30:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKnS+zAHE26NPq1KY6AfQkLd-Tyeson1-esnf+5EX9+xtg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] perf/x86/intel/uncore: renames in response to
 multi-die/pkg support
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:02 AM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:

>
> I think the "box" terminology in perf uncore has different meaning. It
> stands for an uncore PMU unit on a socket/die.
> I think it may be better use "die" to replace the "pkg".
> How about the patch as below?

Also fine with me.
And I've replaced my rename patch with yours here too.

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center