Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:28:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:28:29 -0400 Received: from shed.alex.org.uk ([195.224.53.219]:21167 "HELO shed.alex.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:28:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:28:44 +0100 From: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Reply-To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel To: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@alex.org.uk Cc: mingo@elte.hu, jamal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kuznetsov , Robert Olsson , Benjamin LaHaise , netdev@oss.sgi.com, Linus Torvalds , Simon Kirby , Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Message-ID: <309943687.1002241724@[195.224.237.69]> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --On Thursday, 04 October, 2001 11:10 PM +0100 Alan Cox wrote: > You only think that. After a few minutes the kiddie pulls down your > routing because your route daemons execute no code. Also during the > attack your sshd wont run so you cant log in to find out what is up There is truth in this. Which is why doing things like a crude WRED on the card, in the firmware, (i.e. before it sends the data into user space) is something we looked at but never got round to. -- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/