Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp6262836yba; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:47:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxbV2s294lezHHQx/QyFArSGtu7L8mgQxi6FMoKIr2reI414FtO9cAeHh5tmKph7ifiaUXI X-Received: by 2002:a65:478a:: with SMTP id e10mr37697848pgs.310.1557834469703; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:47:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557834469; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ePy2+gCSH3n/DjiGkGrWdG8E4AgBVTJ/gpNFR44kB95XsiKP0PGTsVDR9WTXuVzaPo dQKl69Ma300XuXsPZ943cpu3mM0RN5rHw+0UBpgCShHEN/m28gFUK3OvHopVPPdFTBbH 8qDRO/sUWTFpNi7WIrVPRtLTLGsZZ/BV0lPlHJHHFvWLwR4bhFlOFQWYTl9zbJ+E0cXA q/4aRDYV9vgRk3QMdhe4pKDV9RDRewB5Kt8COtyGWNivsNanLLV5QLzVgfd4zywOurUq frZhd2HCsy4H94k7L+prJiKsvdZmoBeDkx8N8zXTsdhEVcw8gj3Rl52q5kX0RVFVJJCz SRZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=sl8pAnYYR4uGZnNWIpVNYIqnobtRpRPcdaCcrQrFkLc=; b=0y8HnAc6iO0LXn95WwR2SVivtPbRrhkYTe3F+wTzUUToEnS/eXeXLRrE2yVsausg3M eHc/5isfA4uf80gH6SKUEbx1epE1kjnEZ8kQJ4SqtVIPUm+4jqs5kyEDdXRDRz1eSJ9v oFY98KGtCx1218pL6/Uxc6SivDpcxrZQSKIcDyWOJGbRN99LyUbe8/XvYoynudBz0s3z 5F9QVD4phDqt1HXkN4y/ixiRPElwqHtQJg5Wt9vwjSq/yQZc2eTfyAI2p1IQYuiqYUN5 iVp2b1jpzqPhEqnykECTN9n5ZqwAVmQquwjtSQI1E+1JN/LuzhI1gm0U9J7c/gzUDANj N/Cw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si20406906pgy.200.2019.05.14.04.47.34; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726424AbfENLqS (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 14 May 2019 07:46:18 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:43424 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725893AbfENLqR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2019 07:46:17 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8964B479F0FB55E88D5A; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:46:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.202.227.238) by DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:46:08 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: libsas: delete sas port if expander discover failed To: Jason Yan , , References: <20190514024239.47313-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> <20190514024239.47313-2-yanaijie@huawei.com> <6b831fd1-825e-19a7-0981-bc182cf4685f@huawei.com> <8af67af8-6fe5-0b5a-5308-8134aec74a1a@huawei.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , , Linuxarm From: John Garry Message-ID: <0fa94b30-0303-164f-1052-56527ee84402@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 12:46:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8af67af8-6fe5-0b5a-5308-8134aec74a1a@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.238] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/05/2019 12:37, Jason Yan wrote: > > > On 2019/5/14 18:45, John Garry wrote: >> On 14/05/2019 03:42, Jason Yan wrote: >>> The sas_port(phy->port) allocated in sas_ex_discover_expander() will not >>> be deleted when the expander failed to discover. This will cause >>> resource leak and a further issue of kernel BUG like below: >>> >>> [159785.843156] port-2:17:29: trying to add phy phy-2:17:29 fails: it's >>> already part of another port >>> [159785.852144] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> [159785.856833] kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:1086! >>> [159785.863000] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP >>> [159785.867866] CPU: 39 PID: 16993 Comm: kworker/u96:2 Tainted: G >>> W OE 4.19.25-vhulk1901.1.0.h111.aarch64 #1 >>> [159785.878458] Hardware name: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. >>> Hi1620EVBCS/Hi1620EVBCS, BIOS Hi1620 CS B070 1P TA 03/21/2019 >>> [159785.889231] Workqueue: 0000:74:02.0_disco_q sas_discover_domain >>> [159785.895224] pstate: 40c00009 (nZcv daif +PAN +UAO) >>> [159785.900094] pc : sas_port_add_phy+0x188/0x1b8 >>> [159785.904524] lr : sas_port_add_phy+0x188/0x1b8 >>> [159785.908952] sp : ffff0001120e3b80 >>> [159785.912341] x29: ffff0001120e3b80 x28: 0000000000000000 >>> [159785.917727] x27: ffff802ade8f5400 x26: ffff0000681b7560 >>> [159785.923111] x25: ffff802adf11a800 x24: ffff0000680e8000 >>> [159785.928496] x23: ffff802ade8f5728 x22: ffff802ade8f5708 >>> [159785.933880] x21: ffff802adea2db40 x20: ffff802ade8f5400 >>> [159785.939264] x19: ffff802adea2d800 x18: 0000000000000010 >>> [159785.944649] x17: 00000000821bf734 x16: ffff00006714faa0 >>> [159785.950033] x15: ffff0000e8ab4ecf x14: 7261702079646165 >>> [159785.955417] x13: 726c612073277469 x12: ffff00006887b830 >>> [159785.960802] x11: ffff00006773eaa0 x10: 7968702079687020 >>> [159785.966186] x9 : 0000000000002453 x8 : 726f702072656874 >>> [159785.971570] x7 : 6f6e6120666f2074 x6 : ffff802bcfb21290 >>> [159785.976955] x5 : ffff802bcfb21290 x4 : 0000000000000000 >>> [159785.982339] x3 : ffff802bcfb298c8 x2 : 337752b234c2ab00 >>> [159785.987723] x1 : 337752b234c2ab00 x0 : 0000000000000000 >>> [159785.993108] Process kworker/u96:2 (pid: 16993, stack limit = >>> 0x0000000072dae094) >>> [159786.000576] Call trace: >>> [159786.003097] sas_port_add_phy+0x188/0x1b8 >>> [159786.007179] sas_ex_get_linkrate.isra.5+0x134/0x140 >>> [159786.012130] sas_ex_discover_expander+0x128/0x408 >>> [159786.016906] sas_ex_discover_dev+0x218/0x4c8 >>> [159786.021249] sas_ex_discover_devices+0x9c/0x1a8 >>> [159786.025852] sas_discover_root_expander+0x134/0x160 >>> [159786.030802] sas_discover_domain+0x1b8/0x1e8 >>> [159786.035148] process_one_work+0x1b4/0x3f8 >>> [159786.039230] worker_thread+0x54/0x470 >>> [159786.042967] kthread+0x134/0x138 >>> [159786.046269] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >>> [159786.049918] Code: 91322300 f0004402 91178042 97fe4c9b (d4210000) >>> [159786.056083] Modules linked in: hns3_enet_ut(OE) hclge(OE) hnae3(OE) >>> hisi_sas_test_hw(OE) hisi_sas_test_main(OE) serdes(OE) >>> [159786.067202] ---[ end trace 03622b9e2d99e196 ]--- >>> [159786.071893] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception >>> [159786.077190] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs >>> [159786.081192] Kernel Offset: disabled >>> [159786.084753] CPU features: 0x2,a2a00a38 >>> >>> Fixes: 2908d778ab3e ("[SCSI] aic94xx: new driver") Reviewed-by: John Garry >>> Reported-by: Jian Luo >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan >>> CC: John Garry >>> --- >>> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >>> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >>> index 83f2fd70ce76..9f7e2457360e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >>> @@ -1019,6 +1019,8 @@ static struct domain_device >>> *sas_ex_discover_expander( >>> list_del(&child->dev_list_node); >>> spin_unlock_irq(&parent->port->dev_list_lock); >>> sas_put_device(child); >>> + sas_port_delete(phy->port); >>> + phy->port = NULL; >> >> This looks ok. >> >> However, I wonder if we miss something else, and I see this code >> earlier in sas_ex_discover_expander(): >> >> kref_get(&parent->kref); >> child->parent = parent; >> child->port = port; >> child->iproto = phy->attached_iproto; >> child->tproto = phy->attached_tproto; >> >> I assume the kref get is for the child referencing the parent. Do we >> need the kref put? I couldn't see it. >> >> If yes, maybe it should it go in sas_free_device(), along with kfree() >> for expander device phys. >> > > Yes, the parent's kref will put in sas_free_device(). So the call chain > will be: > > sas_put_device > ->sas_free_device > ->sas_put_device(dev->parent); > ->kref_put > Ah, yes. > Thanks, > Jason > >> Thanks, >> John >> >>> return NULL; >>> } >>> list_add_tail(&child->siblings, &parent->ex_dev.children); >>> >> >> >> >> >> . >> > > > . >