Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp6449149yba; Tue, 14 May 2019 07:46:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQviCc/IWr7Amurkvq62DvsZ7flb+cGNWs8QUiWj6socXnSqsgp7/gCh6bSw906/8lmc1/ X-Received: by 2002:a63:d901:: with SMTP id r1mr498230pgg.271.1557845169504; Tue, 14 May 2019 07:46:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557845169; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=047x0ajPRvPBxkmcme4iaqWWI5fM7YCvpCcHk24caYLDf8izPusHUqd5ra5/5HTGUr guILS3z3dHGp//Tz+e2JGzAS+NudNYXZUWiBuFDLcbn+ep7YXFf8q255BATi6NDwum27 LIzXhonmFHG/F7ke1nfZmfvvugnYue8kfLjlvRw/UkJy6WwnOrU4tsxf53i+UmOOlK1I 9UHCNXQh5DNh4LwK6RR5Of8HS4ZbZB+3cp6Bv1Zox2INuW8Bd4jYvZ5S5pM2BIaf9uY8 McpE8Yjb3LzwUxVL1T4OK49Q97NQvzWfnPEjBSXOUFhtEd9selzdM2LMwVjLfqxMDnv8 Ilug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=ZH4hNBQxRPD0bgtXT/VccJBrij0JT57KynwtiM8A/is=; b=1JpyaS+2mhLF83dWthwVkQoKYVg6s4RA6ljdKNdUx1/l630IOq6atuJTjqripShS9v FZuI+2LHVt0kx50KU1iL6PMk5mBEjdgAP7dZlXz+FclpJczmVasN+dTqmB7fswntk+pC PUzUtLccpcrL4iymicAdUXnWFREUWcMRDUnD+u2+eTG7Isxt7r56SCQ4QdYKDp37Mbc9 53cV3rHbMEgt36sfGoGk/ByL8KBjREtQMmEmiH0Hlq+V00JVUJwo/RAnl4B6H55z9v62 bwXIgwAtTS3PuChIKjSZ0qFgBmnlZ8g1x17/0EfIqpmbxTjI9KoeoSmeFS+i/iqXSXBj KHXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j9si19474060pgp.285.2019.05.14.07.45.54; Tue, 14 May 2019 07:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726603AbfENOnF (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 14 May 2019 10:43:05 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:8191 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726025AbfENOnE (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2019 10:43:04 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id CDB0D1582A9B13AFE968; Tue, 14 May 2019 22:42:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.31.96) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 14 May 2019 22:42:55 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppp: deflate: Fix possible crash in deflate_init To: Guillaume Nault References: <20190514074300.42588-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <20190514140547.GA25993@linux.home> CC: , , , From: YueHaibing Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 22:42:54 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190514140547.GA25993@linux.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.31.96] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/5/14 22:05, Guillaume Nault wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:43:00PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote: >> >> If ppp_deflate fails to register in deflate_init, >> module initialization failed out, however >> ppp_deflate_draft may has been regiestred and not >> unregistered before return. >> Then the seconed modprobe will trigger crash like this. >> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot >> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing >> --- >> drivers/net/ppp/ppp_deflate.c | 14 +++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_deflate.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_deflate.c >> index b5edc7f..2829efe 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_deflate.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_deflate.c >> @@ -610,12 +610,16 @@ static void z_incomp(void *arg, unsigned char *ibuf, int icnt) >> >> static int __init deflate_init(void) >> { >> - int answer = ppp_register_compressor(&ppp_deflate); >> - if (answer == 0) >> - printk(KERN_INFO >> - "PPP Deflate Compression module registered\n"); >> + int answer; >> + >> + answer = ppp_register_compressor(&ppp_deflate); >> + if (answer) >> + return answer; >> + >> + pr_info("PPP Deflate Compression module registered\n"); >> ppp_register_compressor(&ppp_deflate_draft); >> - return answer; >> + >> + return 0; >> } >> > I'd be cleaner to also check for ppp_deflate_draft registration failure > IMHO (and print the log line only if both compressors get registered > successfully). Ok, will send v2 to do that, thanks! > > . >