Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:51:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:51:32 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:26377 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:51:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:51:21 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Roger Larsson Cc: , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [DATAPOINT] how max_readahead settings affect streaming throughput In-Reply-To: <200110042306.f94N69W22095@mailb.telia.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Roger Larsson wrote: > I question the decision to use 124 kB as default read ahead maximum. > The example cited was a FTP server serving 100 clients. With standard > readahead it would give 12.8 MB readahead [snip] Ideally the readahead code would scale itself to use as much memory is available, but no more and without putting pressure on the working set too much. I have some ideas on how to implement this and will start testing them as soon as I have a nice test program for this. regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ (volunteers needed) http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/