Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp139940yba; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:29:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzd2dfUFtsGKqLJc3/pJ/NW1B9G17KFkfoA/YnqWxpAvijYbzDFq5EH3DAC0McRuXN9ff3r X-Received: by 2002:a63:2ace:: with SMTP id q197mr41474253pgq.371.1557894574522; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:29:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557894574; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qz5leinyxT+Mb4ZFhnaTUECkFNsPoN9lE35gw5u5f32wZPlAQdLXG78N4S3Lt0/T5e zZRyqcttVLTiREI3oB6nLvf64Cyq+TvQN5kcXXX5ZCKIls44FV6P93cfQkns/HQtjEBX wIfyLg61qsQnUpEEhhyiFT9PoD/7Ql5TO8FwRCjfSKa7Pe/JRdTKLC8/wN5YRjcvPPHg MIITSThksawaDD5DkyQersjnlEXF/ruugYVOKdUFJIkuMzKNPOLk7RfdYAQUoi1O7ZJG UFHp0XRpHrmcI7zawrvIyWXzbr+h5+CXFLRGqfguDaqrZ62lapiwLHIoq7IjHnz12sP7 GWcA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=SQPoLFFtn8UCv1Z1Nviv/8vDGIi3MGHYFE5v5AoGyB8=; b=x1o5ycooJEtb7LgWVG24xWKQHZfnWgLoiDrDfw1lsFZ6UmIBpAmL/X8uA9gDaGu74T uj2jsp2KjLjWmai+HvA3C/IUvUKflSHbbWzRT8PWl2kddJG8iXsrTFkqovXvZD6iZMZN xBJrsvElUYUZtimWvpvdeI58KkQnMCLK90Jq+sSMrFl65IR6aVgYVYmY10NPQYdTzYlW 5JhofQVi2RFNs6lHJSV4/2pQYtk9Xnp5AYgKc/I6omkIle/swckhLX1RTYFL/1gZ+nu1 bv4VVKPzIDGun7naZ3kqrcO1hINROAUfWWzMZqebD9mjkQaH8gW3bN7xYLdj9tfk4Svc QUmw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q90si1011538pfa.245.2019.05.14.21.29.18; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726290AbfEOE1G (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 May 2019 00:27:06 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:36246 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725876AbfEOE1G (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 00:27:06 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DD2374; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.163.1.137] (unknown [10.163.1.137]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 844E43F703; Tue, 14 May 2019 21:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: refactor __vunmap() to avoid duplicated call to find_vm_area() To: Roman Gushchin , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, Johannes Weiner , Matthew Wilcox , Vlastimil Babka References: <20190514235111.2817276-1-guro@fb.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <78d9b650-4b47-60c5-4212-601c1719dba5@arm.com> Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 09:57:11 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190514235111.2817276-1-guro@fb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/15/2019 05:21 AM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > __vunmap() calls find_vm_area() twice without an obvious reason: > first directly to get the area pointer, second indirectly by calling > vm_remove_mappings()->remove_vm_area(), which is again searching > for the area. > > To remove this redundancy, let's split remove_vm_area() into > __remove_vm_area(struct vmap_area *), which performs the actual area > removal, and remove_vm_area(const void *addr) wrapper, which can > be used everywhere, where it has been used before. Let's pass > a pointer to the vm_area instead of vm_struct to vm_remove_mappings(), > so it can pass it to __remove_vm_area() and avoid the redundant area > lookup. > > On my test setup, I've got 5-10% speed up on vfree()'ing 1000000 > of 4-pages vmalloc blocks. Though results from 1000000 single page vmalloc blocks remain inconclusive, 4-page based vmalloc block's result shows improvement in the range of 5-10%.