Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 08:11:51 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
cc:     Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
        Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
        Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [2/3] Coccinelle: pci_free_consistent: Reduce a bit of duplicate
 SmPL code
In-Reply-To: <20b242a6-23a8-9b48-5cfe-c99df809dd24@web.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905150811310.2591@hadrien>
References: <e30b9777-6440-b041-9df9-f1a27ce06c6c@web.de> <112fa697-3073-1a95-eb5b-fa62ad9607fb@web.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905142146560.2612@hadrien> <20b242a6-23a8-9b48-5cfe-c99df809dd24@web.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> Can different run time characteristics become relevant here?

Internally, they should be identical.

julia