Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 16:38:58 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc:     jannh@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        arnd@arndb.de, dhowells@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        cyphar@cyphar.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        elena.reshetova@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org,
        luto@amacapital.net, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pid: add pidfd_open()
Message-ID: <20190515143857.GB18892@redhat.com>
References: <20190515100400.3450-1-christian@brauner.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190515100400.3450-1-christian@brauner.io>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 05/15, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pidfd_open, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, flags)
> +{
> +	int fd, ret;
> +	struct pid *p;
> +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> +	if (flags)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (pid <= 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	p = find_get_pid(pid);
> +	if (!p)
> +		return -ESRCH;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	tsk = pid_task(p, PIDTYPE_PID);

You do not need find_get_pid() before rcu_lock and put_pid() at the end.
You can just do find_vpid() under rcu_read_lock().

> +	if (!tsk)
> +		ret = -ESRCH;
> +	else if (unlikely(!thread_group_leader(tsk)))
> +		ret = -EINVAL;

it seems that you can do a single check

	tsk = pid_task(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
	if (!tsk)
		ret = -ESRCH;

this even looks more correct if we race with exec changing the leader.

Oleg.