Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp689872yba; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:18:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyteDmgQzZAUHcIXARC/5AMHX8l9zTplWen+AVMprGon93mD5HcCYe7m7pTU4mKCsUWwA5u X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e086:: with SMTP id cb6mr44653400plb.237.1557933514285; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:18:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557933514; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h0p1L3UsP/U5c6rPy2knEf+vhULrjQZIqH3fPSo+e668iAs4NFBYXClkAROwvXb7Us NwbE5OPBz3q4TZg0Ns6qdQrJOEkJAJAroJeqiLidF+plPd50FcTQOp94hdg07vhf15WT kKvR09mOlOy4MlQCYB7qIyRlV55d0HWX91ycbXLDxAoaVpK2+a+z6d/msDdqVvZr1/OS HvdAWydIApQsvyp0Dj6SDb3hCHGQ4uegm5e69xNe2o6jSNiVo1LHptpZOwoiheFcbGym FZJxxo3+JjGkS5XF5npa8WjNcR5Cjnkro4pMmiZU3N8wKAa+zLxKqISjTCeT14l5udmx UDVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=vwxG4zfHU1KFopIJRohTDTKqQxnzS9PnCdczIsuquQE=; b=ipI6p0O1vabd67emeFa6kTWMcc2+pZAOg7cVOmu1MwyVAKo+2jgGPoRfmClfILKjaY ZuxAR2gDOpPDoPI8BJ8OYTUktB8YuZkk8rtb9kNOpwcztKnu4qNSDQEKkSTPknDhBcJI 50zFk4FNh+eniz6MkY7TIz2OeqiGjEAVDB6XXB6xMAxmhsNLF+M0O1CMbvZ9maJGNe3x pxxLc/LJP7xxKLBwK054GTTHjykJpgWuHFWBgQzSfb5eVGWt0ddYxz/eiQWrM9tVIhYc 7pQhS/jkBN5PqDHSanpA3ZOT4TwhsqwXXXohHHnRPflYlW6keQdCDEM24uwqzD5A+tiW 7hqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=gHkvdyLX; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=gtRcPgCq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w12si2028036plz.280.2019.05.15.08.18.19; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=gHkvdyLX; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=gtRcPgCq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727350AbfEOPQD (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 May 2019 11:16:03 -0400 Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.221]:50775 "EHLO new1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726567AbfEOPQD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 11:16:03 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09669B881; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:16:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 May 2019 11:16:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=vwxG4zfHU1KFopIJRohTDTKqQxn zS9PnCdczIsuquQE=; b=gHkvdyLXIDp0vGK+W7yRjq/rjgDBR7tzxR9R7z0JJ1t ETMPawT6EO98yeb7fpVVWt78adtbwr/Q37R6ICQ7ZwRkAQ8vUCi0d75RMV5sb3eO 0xSr5dWVddZu+LzMa6uIh58y3U7HetT2sfUzDyjUzv27XnzaERYulO/VlhQQXWNd QuJ76pupaP85prOYolxkTr2nSaBiE97VCOL8LJl7wOggdplGlOHDeqSTYi/l5aU9 kJtY3WWhxfjjFWVSm4/hnfcVNvvlvUJXggpjlWD4as3sUr0doQ0LcsnMbF1t2KvF wa1kF5teSJTxaOrkcMaK2wFnufZCFGLivbQIb5ch4DA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=vwxG4z fHU1KFopIJRohTDTKqQxnzS9PnCdczIsuquQE=; b=gtRcPgCq3KlYjNgN5VkUbh vPRqtf232eMydJaBzRhgEFMZPVJPaepK61PHnjsTO+aI6xO3+7vnL/QBNCYW0npR mdjON24eCAjS6h/CQZbl5kSg45zXOyaWlWtJoFkhcT0qKt7ACvNcdSx8DeVfrI3V Fu0gV/rF7R27mDeD5OJIQgbAn+yPoLzLGeiwa+uXa/geqqpcbNl1YzklJid0l0vX 9a34M5XrENZALRRrYViU+9A/9NK9oBeRjVzf9HCuAli4jeKE1usn5PEv6h1JSmSh 1PYMfmNLU+/Q08L4tp1ioiGimAOCbgcjleRwUgiZZbUu3NyXTOxvsAwpWkmtpHLQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrleekgdekvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcu mffjuceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepkeefrdekiedrkeelrddutd ejnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomhenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 71077103CB; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:15:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:15:57 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Michal Hocko Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kirill Tkhai , Vlastimil Babka , Matthew Wilcox , Pavel Tatashin , Timofey Titovets , Aaron Tomlin , Grzegorz Halat , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Suren Baghdasaryan , Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] mm/ksm: add option to automerge VMAs Message-ID: <20190515151557.GA23969@kroah.com> References: <20190514131654.25463-1-oleksandr@redhat.com> <20190514144105.GF4683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190514145122.GG4683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190515062523.5ndf7obzfgugilfs@butterfly.localdomain> <20190515065311.GB16651@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190515145151.GG16651@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190515145151.GG16651@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > [Cc Suren and Minchan - the email thread starts here 20190514131654.25463-1-oleksandr@redhat.com] > > On Wed 15-05-19 08:53:11, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > I will try to comment on the interface itself later. But I have to say > > that I am not impressed. Abusing sysfs for per process features is quite > > gross to be honest. > > I have already commented on this in other email. I consider sysfs an > unsuitable interface for per-process API. Wait, what? A new sysfs file/directory per process? That's crazy, no one must have benchmarked it :) And I agree, sysfs is not for that, please don't abuse it. Proc is for process apis. thanks, greg k-h