Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp844218yba; Wed, 15 May 2019 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwzz8qOHCSU6NODlWEMwOojwYf3RfAPPrac8ZM1MLbmqhi5MR5dublxHff4Z5Lh7jIbdMCR X-Received: by 2002:a63:e408:: with SMTP id a8mr45563038pgi.146.1557942909627; Wed, 15 May 2019 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557942909; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bSjXCLabcl19OWphisW0BNMQ52zPCwacNenAse5l2O2ElwlrmYX86pXLRUajRW13CP L0ViDqtGHbKzLFq2ivclJCcpQ2QLkdWSXr9J3zBHfwV5V9FobZXuD+PxIpskDJh1iaLA aEuZSeOeng1StXJ6lANF+ArVIQefmXWAn0LTWbtElKJrNTEve4ae1vHGUux1EjY35MKF na5M2MYsnXQXRiK5y7NhWJiOA+3QLOprpBdsa0Lv7kTFanLNai9kUrfhlz1JiFmyU0ZO WMzSlFDZgTHDe3/bOl/a4j15K1ERo66QekG6v7MryM/1Dwap609Ljcax0MAd2utaHxxo 1eZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=/2TzaCCdBx6Vlai3f3LaNbFewgYX79Tcgo7O3DMXG5c=; b=I5bKq3a+QcuqgSCLGYCTYZP3vN6ls4Jnt60eqc3s/y/gahUak0uLH2ctbiVJbyS9b9 uunrdt1PTgnLlbK9YcEoI0N0W2YyEiTgsNWL1WMIaNA1uI6Uo5XZk5mMfN6Qdky1hl1M bW8dadfhoHcD/ryPZkXyGG0jNr7b+6wq3v/a9IiSO9Ka29izwWr51A1hOvlQLyZ1mnEk 7U5MvomSTCAzHMRjHzy0bte0IXk1lhQcH8a1leeSVHUOCCF0U9tQrrlZFUnlCdV3CasR Ae5ts3PmpryxezD3Fmo7h0QONcFWdiNlYUpGaqcApvUDFgMDtRMQECE0Je1rhmv9ZGFv o9uw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=kbRO3obf; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n20si2279459plp.141.2019.05.15.10.54.53; Wed, 15 May 2019 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=kbRO3obf; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727255AbfEORsz (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 May 2019 13:48:55 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52666 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726360AbfEORsy (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 13:48:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA8F02084F; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:48:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557942533; bh=r++EGBPjC2M3LILhKWcIN7iTN84Apfj6sGnaojnZTMk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kbRO3obfFZXSSyMihvDK42zhLhTJCMQ4uXk/19K1VrXq6KJEW86FtNmMcvgbflAhW 7md44ENvC2KJabvtea270vd8YMiotbzRK5WTxjWMaMmj8pdczwxg9diWgiexnD5dHU DZhKf1/+iOOtxBJ3Lcm8Uy4TjZ5Jn3fERFYtRD2o= Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 19:48:50 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry Finger Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: Add rtl8821ce PCIe WiFi driver Message-ID: <20190515174850.GA22015@kroah.com> References: <20190515112401.15373-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> <20190515114022.GA18824@kroah.com> <6D5557B8-8140-48A8-BED7-9587936902D8@canonical.com> <20190515123319.GA435@kroah.com> <63833AA2-AC8B-4EEA-AF36-EF2A9BFD4F9F@canonical.com> <20190515163945.GA5719@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:40:00AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > at 00:39, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:06:44PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > at 20:33, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 07:54:58PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > > > at 19:40, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 07:24:01PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > > > > > The rtl8821ce can be found on many HP and Lenovo laptops. > > > > > > > Users have been using out-of-tree module for a while, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The new Realtek WiFi driver, rtw88, will support rtl8821ce in 2020 or > > > > > > > later. > > > > > > > > > > > > Where is that driver, and why is it going to take so > > > > > > long to get merged? > > > > > > > > > > rtw88 is in 5.2 now, but it doesn’t support 8821ce yet. > > > > > > > > > > They plan to add the support in 2020. > > > > > > > > Who is "they" and what is needed to support this device and why wait a > > > > full year? > > > > > > “They” refers to Realtek. > > > It’s their plan so I can’t really answer that on behalf of Realtek. > > > > Where did they say that? Any reason their developers are not on this > > patch? > > > > > > > > > 296 files changed, 206166 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > Ugh, why do we keep having to add the whole mess for > > > > > > every single one of > > > > > > these devices? > > > > > > > > > > Because Realtek devices are unfortunately ubiquitous so the support is > > > > > better come from kernel. > > > > > > > > That's not the issue here. The issue is that we keep adding the same > > > > huge driver files to the kernel tree, over and over, with no real change > > > > at all. We have seen almost all of these files in other realtek > > > > drivers, right? > > > > > > Yes. They use one single driver to support different SoCs, different > > > architectures and even different OSes. > > > > Well, they try to, it doesn't always work :( > > > > > That’s why it’s a mess. > > > > Oh we all know why this is a mess. But they have been saying for > > _years_ they would clean up this mess. So push back, I'm not going to > > take another 200k lines for a simple wifi driver, again. > > > > Along those lines, we should probably just delete the other old realtek > > drivers that don't seem to be going anywhere from staging as well, > > because those are just confusing people. > > > > > > Why not use the ones we already have? > > > > > > It’s virtually impossible because Realtek’s mega wifi driver uses tons of > > > #ifdefs, only one chip can be selected to be supported at compile time. > > > > That's not what I asked. > > > > I want to know why they can't just add support for their new devices to > > one of the many existing realtek drivers we already have. That is the > > simpler way, and the correct way to do this. We don't do this by adding > > 200k lines, again. > > > > > > But better yet, why not add proper support for this hardware and not use > > > > a staging driver? > > > > > > Realtek plans to add the support in 2020, if everything goes well. > > > > Device "goes well" please. And when in 2020? And why 2020? Why not > > 2022? 2024? > > > > > Meanwhile, many users of HP and Lenovo laptops are using out-of-tree > > > driver, > > > some of them are stuck to older kernels because they don’t know how to fix > > > the driver. So I strongly think having this in kernel is beneficial > > > to many > > > users, even it’s only for a year. > > > > So who is going to be responsible for "fixing the driver" for all new > > kernel api updates? I'm tired of seeing new developers get lost in the > > maze of yet-another realtek wifi driver. We've been putting up with > > this crud for years, and it has not gotten any better if you want to add > > another 200k lines for some unknown amount of time with the hope that a > > driver might magically show up one day. > > I have no idea why they haven’t made everything upstream, and I do hope they > did a better job, so I don’t need to cleanup their driver and send it > upstream :( > > So basically I can’t answer any of your questions. As Larry suggested, their > driver should be hosted separately and maybe by downstream distro. As it sounds like you have talked to these developers (i.e. they told you 2020), you do have a way to communicate our concerns. Please do that, or feel free to send me their contact information and I will be glad to talk to them about this. thanks, greg k-h