Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751284AbVKKWjv (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:39:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751293AbVKKWjl (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:39:41 -0500 Received: from netzweb.gamper-media.ch ([157.161.128.137]:25873 "EHLO ns1.netzweb.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751189AbVKKWjN (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:39:13 -0500 From: "Miro Dietiker, MD Systems" To: Subject: Patches for Kernel 2.6.14 on kernel.org Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:39:02 +0100 Organization: MD Systems Message-ID: <012b01c5e710$b74e4460$4001a8c0@MDSYSPORT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 701 Lines: 23 Hi! As of the kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/README all patches need to be applied (bigger than the current local version) For the current 2.6.14.2 this seems not to be true (The patch 2.6.14.1 seems to be included in 2.6.14.2) Is this a "new" undocumented general behaviour such as e.g. patches always based on the latest 3-Number version or is this a small mistake? In any case: One of the described sources need to be corrected, I think. Thanks! Miro - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/