Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 06:48:40 +1000
From:   "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 78/86] bridge: Fix error path for
 kobject_init_and_add()
Message-ID: <20190515204840.GE11749@eros.localdomain>
References: <20190515090642.339346723@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20190515090655.622147146@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190515090655.622147146@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:55:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>
> 
> [ Upstream commit bdfad5aec1392b93495b77b864d58d7f101dc1c1 ]

Greg you are not going to back port all of these kobject fixes are you?
There is going to be a _lot_ of them.  I'm not super comfortable
generating all this work for you.  And besides that, I keep making
mistakes (reference to last nights find of double free in powerpc that
you reviewed already), then we have to back port those too.

For the record I've been going through all uses of kobject and splitting
them into categories

 1. Broken
 2. Too complex to immediately tell
 3. Done correctly

I'm not getting many in category #3, let's hope that some in #1 and #2 are
my misunderstanding and that many in #2 should be in #3.  I'm having fun
fixing them but I shudder at making life hard for other people.

Cheers,
Tobin.