Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Cc:     baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, ashok.raj@intel.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, alan.cox@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
        mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, pengfei.xu@intel.com,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] swiotlb: Factor out slot allocation and free
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
References: <0c6e5983-312b-0d6b-92f5-64861cd6804d@linux.intel.com>
 <20190423061232.GB12762@lst.de>
 <dff50b2c-5e31-8b4a-7fdf-99d17852746b@linux.intel.com>
 <20190424144532.GA21480@lst.de>
 <a189444b-15c9-8069-901d-8cdf9af7fc3c@linux.intel.com>
 <20190426150433.GA19930@lst.de>
 <93b3d627-782d-cae0-2175-77a5a8b3fe6e@linux.intel.com>
 <90182d27-5764-7676-8ca6-b2773a40cfe1@arm.com>
 <20190429114401.GA30333@lst.de>
 <7033f384-7823-42ec-6bda-ae74ef689f4f@linux.intel.com>
 <20190513070542.GA18739@lst.de>
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <adfdea8f-1d63-196d-ade1-665e868f5a87@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 09:53:37 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190513070542.GA18739@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 5/13/19 3:05 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 09:54:30AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Agreed. I will prepare the next version simply without the optimization, so
>> the offset is not required.
>>
>> For your changes in swiotlb, will you formalize them in patches or want
>> me to do this?
> 
> Please do it yourself given that you still need the offset and thus a
> rework of the patches anyway.
> 

Okay.

Best regards,
Lu Baolu