Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp521868yba; Thu, 16 May 2019 04:57:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyRTh4gVwjJBzyxf8p4ED6bcAh+ks26xZrKeDJItLFqt1Nx8gTDABiT39ndr/oaGyIAoV5x X-Received: by 2002:a62:e101:: with SMTP id q1mr53888685pfh.160.1558007839013; Thu, 16 May 2019 04:57:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558007839; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DR4oYFpmxunDcUGfvubY/7DdLgMLUQoFCGR2Y0RxX6tLKVX0W23yUgGcmR00lZM8ZO Nuh8pK16m1CjbEHEPn2X29LnTSN0cdEyCTv8YO0fMyio4XhFKrejTRnFaxw5NUh1zbEp 2foR5WBWFQ1COVa+NyDIfwv4pWCv2RDsgjwkMjMeQtfLMhOoPNdedOoFJhrgk4fDxEJd O8NVpm63gXOAmOsaHXGnM10GLnM8FyG5mqsjfESa1AVJiYlm1NRaym4WzN9XcKboLcyY rxBQinqvwsZ48FVDJmN7algTjEZuvvMi4wA7OOCxyVPsJerE1GXs6cwTf1E54Fb95rzA rfSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=gw9Ghc+xQrqh42btkF+tSwScblo1M5MvWvdVH4TT7i0=; b=KQl93WOHeJ+tW5ml4gj99NmCPXOPoiDIVUZGHzrL/i3thCRyUeiRpgAZ+f4WTeKqKu rB+TeGYRrgO7aRKRlJYhN5tISynMuUbBl2FBKK91e5RhOHH9rF1axarbC4Ve1QbrL6R3 PWdSd01hidwsT2FLWHjfREnJXxIbmCuysXq7paPpf4+FltMRvRIHCJ3MZauVVZA2Rso+ NZbv/+118lbhFhBZL9okOEZSYH2HNltOQYOL1OStLSQnsAkkdTzhxwm2oI+RFBb+XoTM /RE4hPoxHDRJ/Sud8S8/vUqWzGdVsqnesR1brHm3f/kfV+03X3hPfRz5bs3Qc1oGtFcr Qd9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=v26qoU6H; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c12si4620507pgw.465.2019.05.16.04.57.03; Thu, 16 May 2019 04:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=v26qoU6H; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727397AbfEPLy6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 May 2019 07:54:58 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.221.193]:39114 "EHLO mail-vk1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727242AbfEPLy5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 07:54:57 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id t18so935588vkb.6 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 04:54:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gw9Ghc+xQrqh42btkF+tSwScblo1M5MvWvdVH4TT7i0=; b=v26qoU6H8L1eKcYMoea7paIcbwqKfFyFfh4g29/LlGR6+AUpIUNU3bNE8s3wyNQJKd kQCGJb9CAIQ2AgFYlk0SLoUn4HsoNoh0eNBdhek1FO+tVLDcJ5NcdPQjy6BRdvLxlaQK 0aIlSfSssyMkTz7GipBksDjARihKegYcNTAz8t5xd/SHkEavzcNuZ/+vIVV1I/nndpea MP06okMhU0f1Athz5O6dl7kceRU43aFcm0qDLB0uMM12eSEiS6XTppcIe0Y4FZn/2rV1 GuoBk8CKXPPLoHvogkLGbVn8coLEnYox/LkyrDuG7ZQXRrykgKDd2NWvR7GV7av2PyfU /tCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gw9Ghc+xQrqh42btkF+tSwScblo1M5MvWvdVH4TT7i0=; b=OxwjtVNNfMJlaBuxPpubNwRUg9lRDCFkeUfWJJFHSPFjuFVLAKLpFuyp3M4t0FJWwS /G/LbGoO1kqlsa3Byg3fwC7FFIkPD1/iJxdCmlO9C7AnUJaoyxwx34RNGcYfUZR35jGB rFom1JvgO9e4b+EFcfksqxT9ISHM4tZj8T226whZC3E051HHepjwnTNfKNsaqiasnwLj /TzNeEX+6SXscCjcuj9BkOzioxAHledLt5/Q2EpujbgiVJOC0TwwZfk2SLcnikXjGLow fScbp+jTGIB8FugKnYQgI+8QQf+A6CFrtDVvgxfIcXD+dOK0xaKD2/mOr1cDrhi3ntPk 1U0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVH0szqVJpiIyk0JJ5QPUQrG0ccpHUb2QfqCTZxXoGhf7WNWB6X 8yoiJ5Dw/cMOvbWYb/OnxEJ8PYPVSvfzZXHKrnZ/Ig== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:812:: with SMTP id 18mr22833450vki.68.1558007696693; Thu, 16 May 2019 04:54:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190114184255.258318-1-mka@chromium.org> <155786856719.14659.2902538189660269078@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <155786856719.14659.2902538189660269078@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> From: Amit Kucheria Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 17:24:45 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add CPU topology To: Stephen Boyd , Andy Gross Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke , David Brown , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-msm , "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , LKML , Douglas Anderson , Rajendra Nayak Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (cc'ing Andy's correct email address) On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:46 AM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-05-13 04:54:12) > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 4:31 PM Amit Kucheria wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:13 AM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > > > > > > The 8 CPU cores of the SDM845 are organized in two clusters of 4 big > > > > ("gold") and 4 little ("silver") cores. Add a cpu-map node to the DT > > > > that describes this topology. > > > > > > This is partly true. There are two groups of gold and silver cores, > > > but AFAICT they are in a single cluster, not two separate ones. SDM845 > > > is one of the early examples of ARM's Dynamiq architecture. > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke > > > > > > I noticed that this patch sneaked through for this merge window but > > > perhaps we can whip up a quick fix for -rc2? > > > > > > > And please find attached a patch to fix this up. Andy, since this > > hasn't landed yet (can we still squash this into the original patch?), > > I couldn't add a Fixes tag. > > > > I had the same concern. Thanks for catching this. I suspect this must > cause some problem for IPA given that it can't discern between the big > and little "power clusters"? Both EAS and IPA, I believe. It influences the scheduler's view of the the topology. > Either way, > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd Thanks. Andy/Bjorn, can we squeeze this in for -rc2 as a bugfix? Regards, Amit